well, the question is in subject.
basically - shouldn't this command raise error instead of creating index
named "concurrently"?
depesz
--
Linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/in/depesz / blog: http://www.depesz.com/
jid/gtalk: depesz@depesz.com / aim:depeszhdl / skype:depesz_hdl / gg:6749007
hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz@depesz.com> writes:
> basically - shouldn't this command raise error instead of creating index
> named "concurrently"?
No. That would mean that "concurrently" is a reserved word.
regards, tom lane