Обсуждение: FAQ corrections

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка

FAQ corrections

От
Ian Barwick
Дата:
Hi

attached some minor corrections, mainly completion of removal of
the  "relation with OID ##### does not exist" item, and some URL corrections.

Ian Barwick

Вложения

Re: FAQ corrections

От
Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Patch applied.  Thanks.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------


Ian Barwick wrote:
> Hi
>
> attached some minor corrections, mainly completion of removal of
> the  "relation with OID ##### does not exist" item, and some URL corrections.
>
> Ian Barwick

[ Attachment, skipping... ]

>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
>                http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq

--
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://postgres.enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

Re: FAQ corrections

От
Robert Treat
Дата:
On Friday 12 October 2007 14:04, Ian Barwick wrote:
> Hi
>
> attached some minor corrections, mainly completion of removal of
> the  "relation with OID ##### does not exist" item, and some URL
> corrections.
>

I'm curious why this was removed. We still get this question a bit on irc and
there aren't any more appropriate answers for any released version than what
the FAQ contained...

--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL

Re: FAQ corrections

От
Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Robert Treat wrote:
> On Friday 12 October 2007 14:04, Ian Barwick wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > attached some minor corrections, mainly completion of removal of
> > the  "relation with OID ##### does not exist" item, and some URL
> > corrections.
> >
>
> I'm curious why this was removed. We still get this question a bit on irc and
> there aren't any more appropriate answers for any released version than what
> the FAQ contained...

The FAQ will match the release it goes with or we could just delay its
removal until after 8.3 is in major circulation and say it only applies
to pre-8.3.

--
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://postgres.enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

Re: FAQ corrections

От
Robert Treat
Дата:
On Tuesday 16 October 2007 15:46, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Robert Treat wrote:
> > On Friday 12 October 2007 14:04, Ian Barwick wrote:
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > attached some minor corrections, mainly completion of removal of
> > > the  "relation with OID ##### does not exist" item, and some URL
> > > corrections.
> >
> > I'm curious why this was removed. We still get this question a bit on irc
> > and there aren't any more appropriate answers for any released version
> > than what the FAQ contained...
>
> The FAQ will match the release it goes with or we could just delay its
> removal until after 8.3 is in major circulation and say it only applies
> to pre-8.3.

I think it should remain, with an addition that this problem should be
resolved as of PostgreSQL 8.3.  Hard to say exactly when, but I would think
it would be at least untill 8.3 is released, and probably better would be 6
months or so later, when (hopefully) people stop asking about this. IMHO.

--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL

Re: FAQ corrections

От
Ian Barwick
Дата:
On Wednesday 17 October 2007 00:02, Robert Treat wrote:
> On Tuesday 16 October 2007 15:46, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Robert Treat wrote:
> > > On Friday 12 October 2007 14:04, Ian Barwick wrote:
> > > > Hi
> > > >
> > > > attached some minor corrections, mainly completion of removal of
> > > > the  "relation with OID ##### does not exist" item, and some URL
> > > > corrections.
> > >
> > > I'm curious why this was removed. We still get this question a bit on
> > > irc and there aren't any more appropriate answers for any released
> > > version than what the FAQ contained...
> >
> > The FAQ will match the release it goes with or we could just delay its
> > removal until after 8.3 is in major circulation and say it only applies
> > to pre-8.3.
>
> I think it should remain, with an addition that this problem should be
> resolved as of PostgreSQL 8.3.  Hard to say exactly when, but I would think
> it would be at least untill 8.3 is released, and probably better would be 6
> months or so later, when (hopefully) people stop asking about this. IMHO.

Sounds sensible. (I removed it while going through checking for broken links
etc., and the section numbering didn't match the contents; checking against
CVS it appeared the intention of Revision 1.393 was to remove this item, cf.
http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/doc/src/FAQ/FAQ.html#rev1.393
).

Attached is an updated FAQ patch which re-includes this item and a note that
it's been resolved in 8.3.


Ian Barwick

Вложения

Re: FAQ corrections

От
Bruce Momjian
Дата:
OK, item re-added.  Thanks.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ian Barwick wrote:
> On Wednesday 17 October 2007 00:02, Robert Treat wrote:
> > On Tuesday 16 October 2007 15:46, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > Robert Treat wrote:
> > > > On Friday 12 October 2007 14:04, Ian Barwick wrote:
> > > > > Hi
> > > > >
> > > > > attached some minor corrections, mainly completion of removal of
> > > > > the  "relation with OID ##### does not exist" item, and some URL
> > > > > corrections.
> > > >
> > > > I'm curious why this was removed. We still get this question a bit on
> > > > irc and there aren't any more appropriate answers for any released
> > > > version than what the FAQ contained...
> > >
> > > The FAQ will match the release it goes with or we could just delay its
> > > removal until after 8.3 is in major circulation and say it only applies
> > > to pre-8.3.
> >
> > I think it should remain, with an addition that this problem should be
> > resolved as of PostgreSQL 8.3.  Hard to say exactly when, but I would think
> > it would be at least untill 8.3 is released, and probably better would be 6
> > months or so later, when (hopefully) people stop asking about this. IMHO.
>
> Sounds sensible. (I removed it while going through checking for broken links
> etc., and the section numbering didn't match the contents; checking against
> CVS it appeared the intention of Revision 1.393 was to remove this item, cf.
> http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/doc/src/FAQ/FAQ.html#rev1.393
> ).
>
> Attached is an updated FAQ patch which re-includes this item and a note that
> it's been resolved in 8.3.
>
>
> Ian Barwick

[ Attachment, skipping... ]

--
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://postgres.enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +