Обсуждение: List of supported 64bit OS
Please, provide a list of OS in which PostgreSQL have a native 64bit support. Thanks!
On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 03:56:01PM +0300, Stanislaw Tristan wrote: > Please, provide a list of OS in which PostgreSQL have a native 64bit > support. Every 64-bit OS I've heard of is listed in the buildfarm. http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_members.pl I think the listed of 64-bit platforms *not* supported may be more interesting. Do you have a particular platform in mind? In any case, the O/S is usually a more important question than the hardware platform. Have anice day, -- Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> http://svana.org/kleptog/ > From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to litigate.
Вложения
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 All of them ... ? At least, I'm not aware of any that PostgreSQL *doesn't* support ... - --On Tuesday, October 10, 2006 15:56:01 +0300 Stanislaw Tristan <admin@zestad.com> wrote: > Please, provide a list of OS in which PostgreSQL have a native 64bit > support. > Thanks! > > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster - ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . scrappy@hub.org MSN . scrappy@hub.org Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFLpMM4QvfyHIvDvMRAvfzAKDsGqIqFsp6cZRpFX9gr5OOJQjWwgCfW/cE 89mzknk1rbEhuZLYJjwfsK4= =lo4o -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > All of them ... ? At least, I'm not aware of any that PostgreSQL *doesn't* > support ... Win32 is not supported on 64bit IIRC. Joshua D. Drake > > --On Tuesday, October 10, 2006 15:56:01 +0300 Stanislaw Tristan > <admin@zestad.com> wrote: > >>> Please, provide a list of OS in which PostgreSQL have a native 64bit >>> support. >>> Thanks! >>> >>> >>> >>> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- >>> TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster > > > > ---- > Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) > Email . scrappy@hub.org MSN . scrappy@hub.org > Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings -- === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. === Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/ Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
On 12/10/06 21:14, "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote: > Marc G. Fournier wrote: >> >> All of them ... ? At least, I'm not aware of any that PostgreSQL *doesn't* >> support ... > > Win32 is not supported on 64bit IIRC. Should be no problem with the win32 build on 64 bit Windows. What we don't have yet is a 64 bit build for win64. Regards, Dave
> > All of them ... ? At least, I'm not aware of any that PostgreSQL > > *doesn't* support ... > > Win32 is not supported on 64bit IIRC. Actually, win32 works just fine on 64bit. Meaning that 32-bit PostgreSQL runs on x64 versions of Windows. Win64, however, is not supported. That would be a 64-bit version of PostgreSQL running on a 64-bit version of Windows. //Magnus
Thanks for the answer! We'll order a 2 x Opteron2xxx series (Dual Core) and the memory will be 16-32 Gb. This server is only for DB - non other services such as hosting, mail and so on. I'm not system integrator, but the project manager and interesting about: - existing the free OS that ideally supports hardware above in conjunction with PostgreSQL 8.x that will use dual core and big memory Thanks! "Martijn van Oosterhout" <kleptog@svana.org> wrote in message news:20061012102647.GD11723@svana.org...
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 01:46:53PM +0300, Stanislaw Tristan wrote:
> Thanks for the answer!
> We'll order a 2 x Opteron2xxx series (Dual Core) and the memory will be
> 16-32 Gb. This server is only for DB - non other services such as hosting,
> mail and so on.
You didn't discuss your disc configuration or interface. That's
going to be an important component. Think about it carefully.
> I'm not system integrator, but the project manager and interesting about:
> - existing the free OS that ideally supports hardware above in conjunction
> with PostgreSQL 8.x that will use dual core and big memory
I would look at FreeBSD, myself. But look _very carefully_ at the
hardware it actually supports before buying anything. People get
burned all the time by buying hardware that is not well supported,
and then having to go through contortions to make the operating
system work well. Choose the OS first, then buy the hardware to
suit, not the other way 'round. (You do this, effectively, when you
buy Sun or IBM RS/6000 gear, don't forget.)
A
--
Andrew Sullivan | ajs@crankycanuck.ca
Users never remark, "Wow, this software may be buggy and hard
to use, but at least there is a lot of code underneath."
--Damien Katz