Обсуждение: access and security

Hi all,

please forgive a (likely) less than clever question.

Are the barriers provided by pg_hba.conf enough from a security
standpoint, or is it best to put up some iptable rules duplicating the
restrictions?

Andy

am  Mon, dem 30.10.2006, um 13:34:34 +0100 mailte Andrew Kelly folgendes:
> Hi all,
>
> please forgive a (likely) less than clever question.
>
> Are the barriers provided by pg_hba.conf enough from a security
> standpoint, or is it best to put up some iptable rules duplicating the
> restrictions?

Of cource, you can define rules for iptables to prevent access to your
database. But consider, this rules obtain for the entire
database-cluster. With pg_hba.conf you can define different permissions
for different databases.

If you need this, than you can't use iptables for this.


Andreas
--
Andreas Kretschmer
Kontakt:  Heynitz: 035242/47215,   D1: 0160/7141639 (mehr: -> Header)
GnuPG-ID:   0x3FFF606C, privat 0x7F4584DA   http://wwwkeys.de.pgp.net

On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 01:34:34PM +0100, Andrew Kelly wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> please forgive a (likely) less than clever question.
>
> Are the barriers provided by pg_hba.conf enough from a security
> standpoint, or is it best to put up some iptable rules duplicating the
> restrictions?

iptables covers the entire server, whereas pg_hba.conf cancontrol per
database. Think of it as layers. If you know only two other machines
will ever access this server, you can use iptables to enforce this.
From those two machines, you than use pg_hba.conf to fine-tune the
access controls.

Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout   <kleptog@svana.org>   http://svana.org/kleptog/
> From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to litigate.

On Mon, 2006-10-30 at 15:36 +0100, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 01:34:34PM +0100, Andrew Kelly wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > please forgive a (likely) less than clever question.
> >
> > Are the barriers provided by pg_hba.conf enough from a security
> > standpoint, or is it best to put up some iptable rules duplicating the
> > restrictions?
>
> iptables covers the entire server, whereas pg_hba.conf cancontrol per
> database. Think of it as layers. If you know only two other machines
> will ever access this server, you can use iptables to enforce this.
> From those two machines, you than use pg_hba.conf to fine-tune the
> access controls.
>
> Have a nice day,

Thanks, Martijn, und danke Andreas.

This is what I figured; appreciate the confirmation.

Andy