Обсуждение: ftell mismatch with expected position
I found this thread (I'm posting here because I'm not subscribed to Hackers) http://www.mail-archive.com/pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org/msg85241.html which seems to be talking about this issue. I'm just wondering what the current status on this is. Someone I know is getting this error -(I'm not 100% sure what version he's running other than it's an 8.2 series, although I am finding out. And yes it's definitely on Windows). Does he have to wait until 8.3? Will it be fixed in 8.3? Or is it fixed in the latest release? Any suggestions for a workaround? (I told him he can generate a Plain backup and compress the result using zip, rar, etc - will this work?) TIA -jcm
Jan Muszynski wrote: > I found this thread (I'm posting here because I'm not subscribed to > Hackers) > http://www.mail-archive.com/pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org/msg85241.html > > which seems to be talking about this issue. I'm just wondering what the > current status on this is. Someone I know is getting this error -(I'm not > 100% sure what version he's running other than it's an 8.2 series, > although I am finding out. And yes it's definitely on Windows). > > Does he have to wait until 8.3? Will it be fixed in 8.3? Or is it fixed in > the latest release? It will be fixed in 8.3. It is too risky to backpatch to 8.2.X. The fix is in current CVS, but again that is 8.3. > Any suggestions for a workaround? (I told him he can generate a Plain > backup and compress the result using zip, rar, etc - will this work?) Yes. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
Bruce Momjian wrote: > Jan Muszynski wrote: >> I found this thread (I'm posting here because I'm not subscribed to >> Hackers) >> http://www.mail-archive.com/pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org/msg85241.html >> >> which seems to be talking about this issue. I'm just wondering what the >> current status on this is. Someone I know is getting this error -(I'm not >> 100% sure what version he's running other than it's an 8.2 series, >> although I am finding out. And yes it's definitely on Windows). >> >> Does he have to wait until 8.3? Will it be fixed in 8.3? Or is it fixed in >> the latest release? > > It will be fixed in 8.3. It is too risky to backpatch to 8.2.X. The > fix is in current CVS, but again that is 8.3. Uh, it was backpatched to 8.2... It's not in a release yet, but it should be in the next one. //Magnus