Обсуждение: Postgres.exe on windows format on command line that starts the process
My questions
1. In the example above does 1372 represent a port?
2. If it is a port then how can I change the ports used OR avoid using certain ports?
Thanks,
Bruce.
Re: Postgres.exe on windows format on command line that starts the process
From: pgsql-general-owner@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-general-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of bruce@concena.com
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2012 8:39 AM
To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: [GENERAL] Postgres.exe on windows format on command line that starts the process
In Windows PostgreSQL spawns numerous postgres.exe processes. When you look at the actual command line you see the command that started the process. For example: "c:/PostgreSQL/8.4/bin/postgres.exe" "--forkbackend" "1372"
My questions
1. In the example above does 1372 represent a port? >>> NO
2. If it is a port then how can I change the ports used OR avoid using certain ports? >>>NOT A PORT
Thanks,
Bruce.
>>> The “1372” is a system process id (pid), basically a PK for a Window’s process.
>>> David J.
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 12:30 PM, Efraín Déctor <efraindector@motumweb.com> wrote: > Hello. What is the difference between Sequential Scans and Sequential > Tuples Read?. A sequential scan is what happens when the table is read sequentially. One sequential scan can result in MANY tuples being read sequentially. I.e. a table with 1M rows being sequentially scanned from end to end will result in 1M sequential tuples being read.
Thank you. -----Mensaje original----- From: Scott Marlowe Sent: Monday, April 02, 2012 1:33 PM To: Efraín Déctor Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Sequential Scans On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 12:30 PM, Efraín Déctor <efraindector@motumweb.com> wrote: > Hello. What is the difference between Sequential Scans and Sequential > Tuples Read?. A sequential scan is what happens when the table is read sequentially. One sequential scan can result in MANY tuples being read sequentially. I.e. a table with 1M rows being sequentially scanned from end to end will result in 1M sequential tuples being read.