Обсуждение: pg_dump not dumping all tables
Hi there,
I am pg_dump-ing all tables from schema public on the server
/usr/local/pgsql/bin/pg_dump -U user my_database --schema=public --encoding=UTF-8 > dump.sql
and re-loading it via psql on my local machine.
But instead of having 708 tables as on the server, I end up with only 570 on my local machine.
When trying to search for the name of a missing table in the dump file, it is indeed not there. Owner of the table is
thesame as on all other tables…
What could that be?
Thanks for any hint!
Stef
On 22 June 2012 10:45, Stefan Schwarzer <stefan.schwarzer@unep.org> wrote: > Hi there, > > I am pg_dump-ing all tables from schema public on the server > > /usr/local/pgsql/bin/pg_dump -U user my_database --schema=public --encoding=UTF-8 > dump.sql > > and re-loading it via psql on my local machine. > > But instead of having 708 tables as on the server, I end up with only 570 on my local machine. > > When trying to search for the name of a missing table in the dump file, it is indeed not there. Owner of the table is thesame as on all other tables… > > What could that be? Are you sure the missing tables are in the public schema? -- If you can't see the forest for the trees, Cut the trees and you'll see there is no forest.
>> Hi there, >> >> I am pg_dump-ing all tables from schema public on the server >> >> /usr/local/pgsql/bin/pg_dump -U user my_database --schema=public --encoding=UTF-8 > dump.sql >> >> and re-loading it via psql on my local machine. >> >> But instead of having 708 tables as on the server, I end up with only 570 on my local machine. >> >> When trying to search for the name of a missing table in the dump file, it is indeed not there. Owner of the table isthe same as on all other tables… >> >> What could that be? > > Are you sure the missing tables are in the public schema? Yes, they are indeed in the public schema.
Out of curiosity, what happens if you dump that database without specifying a schema - do you get all 708 tables?
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 8:45 PM, Stefan Schwarzer <stefan.schwarzer@unep.org> wrote:
Hi there,
I am pg_dump-ing all tables from schema public on the server
/usr/local/pgsql/bin/pg_dump -U user my_database --schema=public --encoding=UTF-8 > dump.sql
and re-loading it via psql on my local machine.
But instead of having 708 tables as on the server, I end up with only 570 on my local machine.
When trying to search for the name of a missing table in the dump file, it is indeed not there. Owner of the table is the same as on all other tables…
What could that be?
Thanks for any hint!
Stef
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
I'd also wonder if it shows up when he does -N public (exclude public schema)? On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 12:37 AM, Anthony Bull <antsbull@gmail.com> wrote: > Out of curiosity, what happens if you dump that database without specifying > a schema - do you get all 708 tables? > > > On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 8:45 PM, Stefan Schwarzer > <stefan.schwarzer@unep.org> wrote: >> >> Hi there, >> >> I am pg_dump-ing all tables from schema public on the server >> >> /usr/local/pgsql/bin/pg_dump -U user my_database --schema=public >> --encoding=UTF-8 > dump.sql >> >> and re-loading it via psql on my local machine. >> >> But instead of having 708 tables as on the server, I end up with only 570 >> on my local machine. >> >> When trying to search for the name of a missing table in the dump file, it >> is indeed not there. Owner of the table is the same as on all other tables… >> >> What could that be? >> >> Thanks for any hint! >> >> Stef >> -- >> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) >> To make changes to your subscription: >> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general > > -- To understand recursion, one must first understand recursion.