Обсуждение: postgres 9.0.2 replicated database is crashing
Hi all -
I am in desperate need of your help. The replication/streaming stopped working on March5th. I followed the following procedure to restart the streaming. After running it for couple of hours , the database is crashing on the slave. This is on our production server. Thanks for your help.
Steps that I followed
1. SELECT pg_start_backup('label', true);
2. I created tar of data.
3. un tar the data on the slave.
4. deleted the pid file on the slave
5. created recovery.conf
5. SELECT pg_stop_backup(); on the primary
6. started the postgres on slave
7. After 2 hours, the slave server crashes
Please help.
Regards
That process merely sets up a new server, it doesn't start streaming,
unless the server has been configured correctly. You state that the
slave crashed after two hours. How did you make this determination?
All you seem to be doing is setting up the slave from scratch
repeatedly, and assuming that it will magically just work, rather than
understanding & debugging why its not working. Where is the log
output from your servers that shows what is really transpiring?
On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 6:51 AM, akp geek <akpgeek@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all -
>
> I am in desperate need of your help. The replication/streaming
> stopped working on March5th. I followed the following procedure to restart
> the streaming. After running it for couple of hours , the database is
> crashing on the slave. This is on our production server. Thanks for your
> help.
>
> Steps that I followed
>
> 1. SELECT pg_start_backup('label', true);
> 2. I created tar of data.
> 3. un tar the data on the slave.
> 4. deleted the pid file on the slave
> 5. created recovery.conf
> 5. SELECT pg_stop_backup(); on the primary
> 6. started the postgres on slave
> 7. After 2 hours, the slave server crashes
>
> Please help.
>
> Regards
>
thank you. As you mentioned, I understood that I am starting the streaming scratch which is not what I wanted to do.
Here is what I am planning to .
Our replication process was down since March5th.
1. Is it Ok to get all wals from March5th till now to standby pg_xlog
2. take pg_basebackup
3. export the data dir
4. stop backup
5. restart the standby.
Based on my understanding it should work, because when standby started, it is not able find the files, as I have deleted from the slave them when I tried to fix the issue
00000 2013-03-09 04:56:08 GMT LOG: entering standby mode
cp: cannot access /backup/9.0.4/archive/0000000100000106000000E1
00000 2013-03-09 04:56:08 GMT LOG: redo starts at 106/E1000020
cp: cannot access /backup/9.0.4/archive/0000000100000106000000E2
cp: cannot access /backup/9.0.4/archive/0000000100000106000000E3
cp: cannot access /backup/9.0.4/archive/0000000100000106000000E4
00000 2013-03-09 04:56:10 GMT LOG: consistent recovery state reached at 106/E45AD4A8
00000 2013-03-09 04:56:10 GMT LOG: database system is ready to accept read only connections
cp: cannot access /backup/9.0.4/archive/0000000100000106000000E5
cp: cannot access /backup/9.0.4/archive/0000000100000106000000E6
cp: cannot access /backup/9.0.4/archive/0000000100000106000000E7
cp: cannot access /backup/9.0.4/archive/0000000100000106000000E8
cp: cannot access /backup/9.0.4/archive/0000000100000106000000E9
cp: cannot access /backup/9.0.4/archive/0000000100000106000000EA
00000 2013-03-09 04:56:12 GMT LOG: invalid record length at 106/EA10B8C0
cp: cannot access /backup/9.0.4/archive/0000000100000106000000EA
00000 2013-03-09 04:56:12 GMT LOG: streaming replication successfully connected to primary
[unknown] 00000 2013-03-09 04:57:00 GMT [unknown]LOG: connection received: host=[local]
[unknown] 00000 2013-03-09 04:57:03 GMT [unknown]LOG: connection received: host=[local]
[unknown] 10.155.253.43(51257) 00000 SELECT 2013-03-09 07:07:18 GMT prodLog: duration: 6316.649 ms
[unknown] 10.155.253.43(51257) 00000 idle 2013-03-09 07:47:53 GMT prodLog: disconnection: session time: 0:41:06.529 user=postgres database=fprod host=
10.155.253.43 port=51257
00000 2013-03-09 07:55:48 GMT LOG: restartpoint starting: time
00000 2013-03-09 08:25:47 GMT LOG: restartpoint complete: wrote 19419 buffers (7.4%); write=1799.792 s, sync=0.066 s, total=1799.867 s
00000 2013-03-09 08:25:47 GMT LOG: recovery restart point at 107/FB01B238
00000 2013-03-09 08:25:47 GMT DETAIL: last completed transaction was at log time 2013-03-09 08:25:41.85776+00
00000 2013-03-09 08:55:48 GMT LOG: restartpoint starting: time
psql [local] 08P01 idle 2013-03-09 09:10:52 GMT prodLog: unexpected EOF on client connection
psql [local] 00000 idle 2013-03-09 09:10:52 GMT prodLog: disconnection: session time: 2:15:06.351 user=postgres database=fprod host=[local]
XX000 2013-03-09 09:23:46 GMT FATAL: failed to add item to index page in 100924/100937/1225845
XX000 2013-03-09 09:23:46 GMT CONTEXT: xlog redo Insert item, node: 100924/100937/1225845 blkno: 72666 offset: 234 nitem: 1 isdata: F isleaf F isdelete
F updateBlkno:36483
00000 2013-03-09 09:23:46 GMT LOG: startup process (PID 3880) exited with exit code 1
00000 2013-03-09 09:23:46 GMT LOG: terminating any other active server processes
thanks
On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Lonni J Friedman <netllama@gmail.com> wrote:
That process merely sets up a new server, it doesn't start streaming,
unless the server has been configured correctly. You state that the
slave crashed after two hours. How did you make this determination?
All you seem to be doing is setting up the slave from scratch
repeatedly, and assuming that it will magically just work, rather than
understanding & debugging why its not working. Where is the log
output from your servers that shows what is really transpiring?
On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 6:51 AM, akp geek <akpgeek@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all -
>
> I am in desperate need of your help. The replication/streaming
> stopped working on March5th. I followed the following procedure to restart
> the streaming. After running it for couple of hours , the database is
> crashing on the slave. This is on our production server. Thanks for your
> help.
>
> Steps that I followed
>
> 1. SELECT pg_start_backup('label', true);
> 2. I created tar of data.
> 3. un tar the data on the slave.
> 4. deleted the pid file on the slave
> 5. created recovery.conf
> 5. SELECT pg_stop_backup(); on the primary
> 6. started the postgres on slave
> 7. After 2 hours, the slave server crashes
>
> Please help.
>
> Regards
>
On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 1:51 PM, akp geek <akpgeek@gmail.com> wrote: > thank you. As you mentioned, I understood that I am starting the streaming > scratch which is not what I wanted to do. > > Here is what I am planning to . > > Our replication process was down since March5th. > > 1. Is it Ok to get all wals from March5th till now to standby pg_xlog > 2. take pg_basebackup > 3. export the data dir > 4. stop backup > 5. restart the standby. > > Based on my understanding it should work, because when standby started, it > is not able find the files, as I have deleted from the slave them when I > tried to fix the issue Clearly it didn't work because you've been having issues for the past 4 days, and you've already tried this approach unsuccessfully. Based on the log snippets below, it looks like you have multiple problems. First your slave is definitely missing WAL segments. You should increase the number of WAL segments that are archived on the master and ensure that your base backup is including the WAL segments (by generating it with the -x option). However, that's the least of your problems at the moment, because it looks like the master is what is crashing. > > > 00000 2013-03-09 04:56:08 GMT LOG: entering standby mode > cp: cannot access /backup/9.0.4/archive/0000000100000106000000E1 > 00000 2013-03-09 04:56:08 GMT LOG: redo starts at 106/E1000020 > cp: cannot access /backup/9.0.4/archive/0000000100000106000000E2 > cp: cannot access /backup/9.0.4/archive/0000000100000106000000E3 > cp: cannot access /backup/9.0.4/archive/0000000100000106000000E4 > 00000 2013-03-09 04:56:10 GMT LOG: consistent recovery state reached at > 106/E45AD4A8 > 00000 2013-03-09 04:56:10 GMT LOG: database system is ready to accept > read only connections > cp: cannot access /backup/9.0.4/archive/0000000100000106000000E5 > cp: cannot access /backup/9.0.4/archive/0000000100000106000000E6 > cp: cannot access /backup/9.0.4/archive/0000000100000106000000E7 > cp: cannot access /backup/9.0.4/archive/0000000100000106000000E8 > cp: cannot access /backup/9.0.4/archive/0000000100000106000000E9 > cp: cannot access /backup/9.0.4/archive/0000000100000106000000EA > 00000 2013-03-09 04:56:12 GMT LOG: invalid record length at 106/EA10B8C0 > cp: cannot access /backup/9.0.4/archive/0000000100000106000000EA > 00000 2013-03-09 04:56:12 GMT LOG: streaming replication successfully > connected to primary > [unknown] 00000 2013-03-09 04:57:00 GMT [unknown]LOG: connection > received: host=[local] > [unknown] 00000 2013-03-09 04:57:03 GMT [unknown]LOG: connection > received: host=[local] > > [unknown] 10.155.253.43(51257) 00000 SELECT 2013-03-09 07:07:18 GMT prodLog: > duration: 6316.649 ms > [unknown] 10.155.253.43(51257) 00000 idle 2013-03-09 07:47:53 GMT prodLog: > disconnection: session time: 0:41:06.529 user=postgres database=fprod host= > 10.155.253.43 port=51257 > 00000 2013-03-09 07:55:48 GMT LOG: restartpoint starting: time > 00000 2013-03-09 08:25:47 GMT LOG: restartpoint complete: wrote 19419 > buffers (7.4%); write=1799.792 s, sync=0.066 s, total=1799.867 s > 00000 2013-03-09 08:25:47 GMT LOG: recovery restart point at > 107/FB01B238 > 00000 2013-03-09 08:25:47 GMT DETAIL: last completed transaction was at > log time 2013-03-09 08:25:41.85776+00 > 00000 2013-03-09 08:55:48 GMT LOG: restartpoint starting: time > psql [local] 08P01 idle 2013-03-09 09:10:52 GMT prodLog: unexpected EOF on > client connection > psql [local] 00000 idle 2013-03-09 09:10:52 GMT prodLog: disconnection: > session time: 2:15:06.351 user=postgres database=fprod host=[local] > XX000 2013-03-09 09:23:46 GMT FATAL: failed to add item to index page in > 100924/100937/1225845 > XX000 2013-03-09 09:23:46 GMT CONTEXT: xlog redo Insert item, node: > 100924/100937/1225845 blkno: 72666 offset: 234 nitem: 1 isdata: F isleaf F > isdelete > F updateBlkno:36483 > 00000 2013-03-09 09:23:46 GMT LOG: startup process (PID 3880) exited > with exit code 1 > 00000 2013-03-09 09:23:46 GMT LOG: terminating any other active server > processes The real problem is here: XX000 2013-03-09 09:23:46 GMT FATAL: failed to add item to index page in 100924/100937/1225845 XX000 2013-03-09 09:23:46 GMT CONTEXT: xlog redo Insert item, node: 100924/100937/1225845 blkno: 72666 offset: 234 nitem: 1 isdata: F isleaf F isdelete F updateBlkno:36483 That looks like something is badly broken (maybe data corruption)? Most of the google hits on that error are associated with GIST indexes. Are you using GIST indexes? Are you really (still) using 9.0.4 ? I hope you realize that there are known data corruption bugs in that version, and that version is super old at this point. You really need to update to 9.0.12.
Appreciate your findings. taking your points and doing things now. We can upgrade. Which version is more stable 9.2 or 9.1
We use GIST indexes quite a bit. and we gis also
I recently compiled postgres 9.2 ..
Regards
On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 5:09 PM, Lonni J Friedman <netllama@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 1:51 PM, akp geek <akpgeek@gmail.com> wrote:Clearly it didn't work because you've been having issues for the past
> thank you. As you mentioned, I understood that I am starting the streaming
> scratch which is not what I wanted to do.
>
> Here is what I am planning to .
>
> Our replication process was down since March5th.
>
> 1. Is it Ok to get all wals from March5th till now to standby pg_xlog
> 2. take pg_basebackup
> 3. export the data dir
> 4. stop backup
> 5. restart the standby.
>
> Based on my understanding it should work, because when standby started, it
> is not able find the files, as I have deleted from the slave them when I
> tried to fix the issue
4 days, and you've already tried this approach unsuccessfully. Based
on the log snippets below, it looks like you have multiple problems.
First your slave is definitely missing WAL segments. You should
increase the number of WAL segments that are archived on the master
and ensure that your base backup is including the WAL segments (by
generating it with the -x option). However, that's the least of your
problems at the moment, because it looks like the master is what is
crashing.The real problem is here:
>
>
> 00000 2013-03-09 04:56:08 GMT LOG: entering standby mode
> cp: cannot access /backup/9.0.4/archive/0000000100000106000000E1
> 00000 2013-03-09 04:56:08 GMT LOG: redo starts at 106/E1000020
> cp: cannot access /backup/9.0.4/archive/0000000100000106000000E2
> cp: cannot access /backup/9.0.4/archive/0000000100000106000000E3
> cp: cannot access /backup/9.0.4/archive/0000000100000106000000E4
> 00000 2013-03-09 04:56:10 GMT LOG: consistent recovery state reached at
> 106/E45AD4A8
> 00000 2013-03-09 04:56:10 GMT LOG: database system is ready to accept
> read only connections
> cp: cannot access /backup/9.0.4/archive/0000000100000106000000E5
> cp: cannot access /backup/9.0.4/archive/0000000100000106000000E6
> cp: cannot access /backup/9.0.4/archive/0000000100000106000000E7
> cp: cannot access /backup/9.0.4/archive/0000000100000106000000E8
> cp: cannot access /backup/9.0.4/archive/0000000100000106000000E9
> cp: cannot access /backup/9.0.4/archive/0000000100000106000000EA
> 00000 2013-03-09 04:56:12 GMT LOG: invalid record length at 106/EA10B8C0
> cp: cannot access /backup/9.0.4/archive/0000000100000106000000EA
> 00000 2013-03-09 04:56:12 GMT LOG: streaming replication successfully
> connected to primary
> [unknown] 00000 2013-03-09 04:57:00 GMT [unknown]LOG: connection
> received: host=[local]
> [unknown] 00000 2013-03-09 04:57:03 GMT [unknown]LOG: connection
> received: host=[local]
>
> [unknown] 10.155.253.43(51257) 00000 SELECT 2013-03-09 07:07:18 GMT prodLog:
> duration: 6316.649 ms
> [unknown] 10.155.253.43(51257) 00000 idle 2013-03-09 07:47:53 GMT prodLog:
> disconnection: session time: 0:41:06.529 user=postgres database=fprod host=
> 10.155.253.43 port=51257
> 00000 2013-03-09 07:55:48 GMT LOG: restartpoint starting: time
> 00000 2013-03-09 08:25:47 GMT LOG: restartpoint complete: wrote 19419
> buffers (7.4%); write=1799.792 s, sync=0.066 s, total=1799.867 s
> 00000 2013-03-09 08:25:47 GMT LOG: recovery restart point at
> 107/FB01B238
> 00000 2013-03-09 08:25:47 GMT DETAIL: last completed transaction was at
> log time 2013-03-09 08:25:41.85776+00
> 00000 2013-03-09 08:55:48 GMT LOG: restartpoint starting: time
> psql [local] 08P01 idle 2013-03-09 09:10:52 GMT prodLog: unexpected EOF on
> client connection
> psql [local] 00000 idle 2013-03-09 09:10:52 GMT prodLog: disconnection:
> session time: 2:15:06.351 user=postgres database=fprod host=[local]
> XX000 2013-03-09 09:23:46 GMT FATAL: failed to add item to index page in
> 100924/100937/1225845
> XX000 2013-03-09 09:23:46 GMT CONTEXT: xlog redo Insert item, node:
> 100924/100937/1225845 blkno: 72666 offset: 234 nitem: 1 isdata: F isleaf F
> isdelete
> F updateBlkno:36483
> 00000 2013-03-09 09:23:46 GMT LOG: startup process (PID 3880) exited
> with exit code 1
> 00000 2013-03-09 09:23:46 GMT LOG: terminating any other active server
> processesXX000 2013-03-09 09:23:46 GMT FATAL: failed to add item to indexThat looks like something is badly broken (maybe data corruption)?
page in 100924/100937/1225845
XX000 2013-03-09 09:23:46 GMT CONTEXT: xlog redo Insert item,
node: 100924/100937/1225845 blkno: 72666 offset: 234 nitem: 1 isdata:
F isleaf F isdelete F updateBlkno:36483
Most of the google hits on that error are associated with GIST
indexes. Are you using GIST indexes?
Are you really (still) using 9.0.4 ? I hope you realize that there
are known data corruption bugs in that version, and that version is
super old at this point. You really need to update to 9.0.12.
On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 4:05 PM, akp geek <akpgeek@gmail.com> wrote: > Appreciate your findings. taking your points and doing things now. We can > upgrade. Which version is more stable 9.2 or 9.1 They're two entirely different branches. They should both be equally stable. However, if you're looking for the most straightforward path I'd recommend going to 9.0.12. Also be sure to read the release notes first. > > We use GIST indexes quite a bit. and we gis also > > I recently compiled postgres 9.2 .. > > Regards > > > > On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 5:09 PM, Lonni J Friedman <netllama@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 1:51 PM, akp geek <akpgeek@gmail.com> wrote: >> > thank you. As you mentioned, I understood that I am starting the >> > streaming >> > scratch which is not what I wanted to do. >> > >> > Here is what I am planning to . >> > >> > Our replication process was down since March5th. >> > >> > 1. Is it Ok to get all wals from March5th till now to standby pg_xlog >> > 2. take pg_basebackup >> > 3. export the data dir >> > 4. stop backup >> > 5. restart the standby. >> > >> > Based on my understanding it should work, because when standby started, >> > it >> > is not able find the files, as I have deleted from the slave them when I >> > tried to fix the issue >> >> Clearly it didn't work because you've been having issues for the past >> 4 days, and you've already tried this approach unsuccessfully. Based >> on the log snippets below, it looks like you have multiple problems. >> First your slave is definitely missing WAL segments. You should >> increase the number of WAL segments that are archived on the master >> and ensure that your base backup is including the WAL segments (by >> generating it with the -x option). However, that's the least of your >> problems at the moment, because it looks like the master is what is >> crashing. >> >> > >> > >> > 00000 2013-03-09 04:56:08 GMT LOG: entering standby mode >> > cp: cannot access /backup/9.0.4/archive/0000000100000106000000E1 >> > 00000 2013-03-09 04:56:08 GMT LOG: redo starts at 106/E1000020 >> > cp: cannot access /backup/9.0.4/archive/0000000100000106000000E2 >> > cp: cannot access /backup/9.0.4/archive/0000000100000106000000E3 >> > cp: cannot access /backup/9.0.4/archive/0000000100000106000000E4 >> > 00000 2013-03-09 04:56:10 GMT LOG: consistent recovery state reached >> > at >> > 106/E45AD4A8 >> > 00000 2013-03-09 04:56:10 GMT LOG: database system is ready to >> > accept >> > read only connections >> > cp: cannot access /backup/9.0.4/archive/0000000100000106000000E5 >> > cp: cannot access /backup/9.0.4/archive/0000000100000106000000E6 >> > cp: cannot access /backup/9.0.4/archive/0000000100000106000000E7 >> > cp: cannot access /backup/9.0.4/archive/0000000100000106000000E8 >> > cp: cannot access /backup/9.0.4/archive/0000000100000106000000E9 >> > cp: cannot access /backup/9.0.4/archive/0000000100000106000000EA >> > 00000 2013-03-09 04:56:12 GMT LOG: invalid record length at >> > 106/EA10B8C0 >> > cp: cannot access /backup/9.0.4/archive/0000000100000106000000EA >> > 00000 2013-03-09 04:56:12 GMT LOG: streaming replication >> > successfully >> > connected to primary >> > [unknown] 00000 2013-03-09 04:57:00 GMT [unknown]LOG: connection >> > received: host=[local] >> > [unknown] 00000 2013-03-09 04:57:03 GMT [unknown]LOG: connection >> > received: host=[local] >> > >> > [unknown] 10.155.253.43(51257) 00000 SELECT 2013-03-09 07:07:18 GMT >> > prodLog: >> > duration: 6316.649 ms >> > [unknown] 10.155.253.43(51257) 00000 idle 2013-03-09 07:47:53 GMT >> > prodLog: >> > disconnection: session time: 0:41:06.529 user=postgres database=fprod >> > host= >> > 10.155.253.43 port=51257 >> > 00000 2013-03-09 07:55:48 GMT LOG: restartpoint starting: time >> > 00000 2013-03-09 08:25:47 GMT LOG: restartpoint complete: wrote >> > 19419 >> > buffers (7.4%); write=1799.792 s, sync=0.066 s, total=1799.867 s >> > 00000 2013-03-09 08:25:47 GMT LOG: recovery restart point at >> > 107/FB01B238 >> > 00000 2013-03-09 08:25:47 GMT DETAIL: last completed transaction was >> > at >> > log time 2013-03-09 08:25:41.85776+00 >> > 00000 2013-03-09 08:55:48 GMT LOG: restartpoint starting: time >> > psql [local] 08P01 idle 2013-03-09 09:10:52 GMT prodLog: unexpected EOF >> > on >> > client connection >> > psql [local] 00000 idle 2013-03-09 09:10:52 GMT prodLog: disconnection: >> > session time: 2:15:06.351 user=postgres database=fprod host=[local] >> > XX000 2013-03-09 09:23:46 GMT FATAL: failed to add item to index >> > page in >> > 100924/100937/1225845 >> > XX000 2013-03-09 09:23:46 GMT CONTEXT: xlog redo Insert item, node: >> > 100924/100937/1225845 blkno: 72666 offset: 234 nitem: 1 isdata: F isleaf >> > F >> > isdelete >> > F updateBlkno:36483 >> > 00000 2013-03-09 09:23:46 GMT LOG: startup process (PID 3880) exited >> > with exit code 1 >> > 00000 2013-03-09 09:23:46 GMT LOG: terminating any other active >> > server >> > processes >> >> The real problem is here: >> XX000 2013-03-09 09:23:46 GMT FATAL: failed to add item to index >> page in 100924/100937/1225845 >> XX000 2013-03-09 09:23:46 GMT CONTEXT: xlog redo Insert item, >> node: 100924/100937/1225845 blkno: 72666 offset: 234 nitem: 1 isdata: >> F isleaf F isdelete F updateBlkno:36483 >> >> That looks like something is badly broken (maybe data corruption)? >> Most of the google hits on that error are associated with GIST >> indexes. Are you using GIST indexes? >> >> Are you really (still) using 9.0.4 ? I hope you realize that there >> are known data corruption bugs in that version, and that version is >> super old at this point. You really need to update to 9.0.12. > > -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ L. Friedman netllama@gmail.com LlamaLand https://netllama.linux-sxs.org
thanks a lot. One final question on this.
if the streaming fails as in our case, we missed 4 days worth of data. We archive the log files on the primary. if we were to restart , what should be starting the point ?
Do we need to get all the archived logs to the pg_xlogs from the date ( in our case 03/05 ) . This is where I got confused.
Again thanks a lot. Now we will definitely upgrade
Regards
On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 7:11 PM, Lonni J Friedman <netllama@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 4:05 PM, akp geek <akpgeek@gmail.com> wrote:They're two entirely different branches. They should both be equally
> Appreciate your findings. taking your points and doing things now. We can
> upgrade. Which version is more stable 9.2 or 9.1
stable. However, if you're looking for the most straightforward path
I'd recommend going to 9.0.12. Also be sure to read the release notes
first.--
>
> We use GIST indexes quite a bit. and we gis also
>
> I recently compiled postgres 9.2 ..
>
> Regards
>
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 5:09 PM, Lonni J Friedman <netllama@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 1:51 PM, akp geek <akpgeek@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > thank you. As you mentioned, I understood that I am starting the
>> > streaming
>> > scratch which is not what I wanted to do.
>> >
>> > Here is what I am planning to .
>> >
>> > Our replication process was down since March5th.
>> >
>> > 1. Is it Ok to get all wals from March5th till now to standby pg_xlog
>> > 2. take pg_basebackup
>> > 3. export the data dir
>> > 4. stop backup
>> > 5. restart the standby.
>> >
>> > Based on my understanding it should work, because when standby started,
>> > it
>> > is not able find the files, as I have deleted from the slave them when I
>> > tried to fix the issue
>>
>> Clearly it didn't work because you've been having issues for the past
>> 4 days, and you've already tried this approach unsuccessfully. Based
>> on the log snippets below, it looks like you have multiple problems.
>> First your slave is definitely missing WAL segments. You should
>> increase the number of WAL segments that are archived on the master
>> and ensure that your base backup is including the WAL segments (by
>> generating it with the -x option). However, that's the least of your
>> problems at the moment, because it looks like the master is what is
>> crashing.
>>
>> >
>> >
>> > 00000 2013-03-09 04:56:08 GMT LOG: entering standby mode
>> > cp: cannot access /backup/9.0.4/archive/0000000100000106000000E1
>> > 00000 2013-03-09 04:56:08 GMT LOG: redo starts at 106/E1000020
>> > cp: cannot access /backup/9.0.4/archive/0000000100000106000000E2
>> > cp: cannot access /backup/9.0.4/archive/0000000100000106000000E3
>> > cp: cannot access /backup/9.0.4/archive/0000000100000106000000E4
>> > 00000 2013-03-09 04:56:10 GMT LOG: consistent recovery state reached
>> > at
>> > 106/E45AD4A8
>> > 00000 2013-03-09 04:56:10 GMT LOG: database system is ready to
>> > accept
>> > read only connections
>> > cp: cannot access /backup/9.0.4/archive/0000000100000106000000E5
>> > cp: cannot access /backup/9.0.4/archive/0000000100000106000000E6
>> > cp: cannot access /backup/9.0.4/archive/0000000100000106000000E7
>> > cp: cannot access /backup/9.0.4/archive/0000000100000106000000E8
>> > cp: cannot access /backup/9.0.4/archive/0000000100000106000000E9
>> > cp: cannot access /backup/9.0.4/archive/0000000100000106000000EA
>> > 00000 2013-03-09 04:56:12 GMT LOG: invalid record length at
>> > 106/EA10B8C0
>> > cp: cannot access /backup/9.0.4/archive/0000000100000106000000EA
>> > 00000 2013-03-09 04:56:12 GMT LOG: streaming replication
>> > successfully
>> > connected to primary
>> > [unknown] 00000 2013-03-09 04:57:00 GMT [unknown]LOG: connection
>> > received: host=[local]
>> > [unknown] 00000 2013-03-09 04:57:03 GMT [unknown]LOG: connection
>> > received: host=[local]
>> >
>> > [unknown] 10.155.253.43(51257) 00000 SELECT 2013-03-09 07:07:18 GMT
>> > prodLog:
>> > duration: 6316.649 ms
>> > [unknown] 10.155.253.43(51257) 00000 idle 2013-03-09 07:47:53 GMT
>> > prodLog:
>> > disconnection: session time: 0:41:06.529 user=postgres database=fprod
>> > host=
>> > 10.155.253.43 port=51257
>> > 00000 2013-03-09 07:55:48 GMT LOG: restartpoint starting: time
>> > 00000 2013-03-09 08:25:47 GMT LOG: restartpoint complete: wrote
>> > 19419
>> > buffers (7.4%); write=1799.792 s, sync=0.066 s, total=1799.867 s
>> > 00000 2013-03-09 08:25:47 GMT LOG: recovery restart point at
>> > 107/FB01B238
>> > 00000 2013-03-09 08:25:47 GMT DETAIL: last completed transaction was
>> > at
>> > log time 2013-03-09 08:25:41.85776+00
>> > 00000 2013-03-09 08:55:48 GMT LOG: restartpoint starting: time
>> > psql [local] 08P01 idle 2013-03-09 09:10:52 GMT prodLog: unexpected EOF
>> > on
>> > client connection
>> > psql [local] 00000 idle 2013-03-09 09:10:52 GMT prodLog: disconnection:
>> > session time: 2:15:06.351 user=postgres database=fprod host=[local]
>> > XX000 2013-03-09 09:23:46 GMT FATAL: failed to add item to index
>> > page in
>> > 100924/100937/1225845
>> > XX000 2013-03-09 09:23:46 GMT CONTEXT: xlog redo Insert item, node:
>> > 100924/100937/1225845 blkno: 72666 offset: 234 nitem: 1 isdata: F isleaf
>> > F
>> > isdelete
>> > F updateBlkno:36483
>> > 00000 2013-03-09 09:23:46 GMT LOG: startup process (PID 3880) exited
>> > with exit code 1
>> > 00000 2013-03-09 09:23:46 GMT LOG: terminating any other active
>> > server
>> > processes
>>
>> The real problem is here:
>> XX000 2013-03-09 09:23:46 GMT FATAL: failed to add item to index
>> page in 100924/100937/1225845
>> XX000 2013-03-09 09:23:46 GMT CONTEXT: xlog redo Insert item,
>> node: 100924/100937/1225845 blkno: 72666 offset: 234 nitem: 1 isdata:
>> F isleaf F isdelete F updateBlkno:36483
>>
>> That looks like something is badly broken (maybe data corruption)?
>> Most of the google hits on that error are associated with GIST
>> indexes. Are you using GIST indexes?
>>
>> Are you really (still) using 9.0.4 ? I hope you realize that there
>> are known data corruption bugs in that version, and that version is
>> super old at this point. You really need to update to 9.0.12.
>
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
L. Friedman netllama@gmail.com
LlamaLand https://netllama.linux-sxs.org