Обсуждение: Re: [HACKERS] (: JDBC+(Sun ~3:pm MST) CVS :) -also question about regression tests
Re: [HACKERS] (: JDBC+(Sun ~3:pm MST) CVS :) -also question about regression tests
От
Andrew Martin
Дата:
> > > > > > I'll say it again and again - glibc-2.0 is the _STANDARD_ (actually > > > > > > reference) platform for Unix. All Unix. Not just Linux. > > > > > > Adopted last year. > > > > > > > > > > And...how many Unix (other then Linux) are *actually* using it? > > > > > Any idea on how we can test whether it is being used or not? > > > > > > > > AFAIK some BSD's are now using it - but I am probably wrong. I gave up on > > > > BSD in '92. > > > > > > Geez, about the time I gave up on Linux and converted to *BSD > > > *grin* > > > > > No wonder you're so anti-Linux if you stopped using it in '92. I started with > > 0.99pl13 in November '93. It must have been around v0.2 in '92 and of course > > it wasn't stable then.... > > Checking now...oops, you are right: > > Record created on 03-Jun-93. Still can't have been much beyond 0.8 At last I understand why Marc is anti-Linux :-) > > That was when we created the DNS record for my first company, > which ran 2/3rds on Linux...so whatever version existed back there. > > In Linux's favor here, though...even at that point, if you ran > Linux on a *non-networked* system (ie. we had some dialup lines into it, > but not networking)...that thing ran pretty much rock-solid. It wasn't > until we actually put some load on her that she wouldn't run for more then > a day or so at a time... FAINTS....... :-) Andrew ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Dr. Andrew C.R. Martin University College London EMAIL: (Work) martin@biochem.ucl.ac.uk (Home) andrew@stagleys.demon.co.uk URL: http://www.biochem.ucl.ac.uk/~martin Tel: (Work) +44(0)171 419 3890 (Home) +44(0)1372 275775
Re: [HACKERS] (: JDBC+(Sun ~3:pm MST) CVS :) -also question about regression tests
От
The Hermit Hacker
Дата:
On Tue, 3 Feb 1998, Andrew Martin wrote: > > Still can't have been much beyond 0.8 Actually, I believe we were running v0.99pl++