Обсуждение: Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump, problem with user defined types?
Bruce, If you have the relevant discussions in a neat bundle I'd like to have a read through them to see what the issues are. The other curiosity is the creation of an _<typname> type, which I believe is an array type, at the time of type creation. I can't remember seeing this in previous versions. Thanks, Keith. > > Needless to say, I can't dump/restore a database with user defined > > types at all. > > Yes, we have a problem with user-defined types because of the changes I > made to make the function name unique by adding the pg_proc oid to the > name. > > I can make the fix, but no one seems to have an opinion on how yet. I > can e-mail the pertinent postings if you want to discuss solutions.
> Bruce, > > If you have the relevant discussions in a neat bundle I'd like > to have a read through them to see what the issues are. > > The other curiosity is the creation of an _<typname> type, which > I believe is an array type, at the time of type creation. > > I can't remember seeing this in previous versions. > > Thanks, > Keith. OK, here are the relivant postings. Please make a suggestion for a fix. -- Bruce Momjian | maillist@candle.pha.pa.us 830 Blythe Avenue | http://www.op.net/~candle Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026 | (610) 353-9879(w) + If your life is a hard drive, | (610) 853-3000(h) + Christ can be your backup. |