Обсуждение: 6.4.1 fails to compile

I get this error:

gcc2 -I../../../include -I../../../backend   -I/usr/local/include/readline -O2 -
m486 -pipe  -g -Wall -I../..   -c nabstime.c -o nabstime.o
nabstime.c: In function `GetCurrentAbsoluteTime':
nabstime.c:78: `tzn' undeclared (first use this function)
nabstime.c:78: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
nabstime.c:78: for each function it appears in.)
gmake[3]: *** [nabstime.o] Error 1

Marc plans to package up the release on Monday night.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 

> nabstime.c: In function `GetCurrentAbsoluteTime':
> nabstime.c:78: `tzn' undeclared (first use this function)
> Marc plans to package up the release on Monday night.

I thought he or I fixed it. Will check...
                 - Tom

> > nabstime.c: In function `GetCurrentAbsoluteTime':
> > nabstime.c:78: `tzn' undeclared (first use this function)
> > Marc plans to package up the release on Monday night.

Fixed. The fix had been only applied to the main tree. Sorry.
                       - Tom

On Sat, 19 Dec 1998, Thomas G. Lockhart wrote:

> > > nabstime.c: In function `GetCurrentAbsoluteTime':
> > > nabstime.c:78: `tzn' undeclared (first use this function)
> > > Marc plans to package up the release on Monday night.
> 
> Fixed. The fix had been only applied to the main tree. Sorry.
My fauilt too...I thought the bug was only in the main
tree...wonder how that bug sneaked into v6.4's tree...eh Tom? :)

Marc G. Fournier                                
Systems Administrator @ hub.org 
primary: scrappy@hub.org           secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org 

> > > > nabstime.c: In function `GetCurrentAbsoluteTime':
> > > > nabstime.c:78: `tzn' undeclared (first use this function)
> > > > Marc plans to package up the release on Monday night.
> > Fixed. The fix had been only applied to the main tree. Sorry.
>         My fault too...I thought the bug was only in the main
> tree...wonder how that bug sneaked into v6.4's tree...eh Tom? :)

By popular acclaim :)

It was discussed on the hacker's list before being applied. Caught ya'
napping, eh? Maybe we don't have much adult supervision after all? :)
                  - Tom