Обсуждение: Regression test failure on 7.0-STABLE

Hi,

I saw some errors on the regression test, and they are new to me.
Here are the output from checkresults.

======   rules   ======
1168d1167
<  pg_indexes         | SELECT c.relname AS tablename, i.relname AS indexname, pg_get_indexdef(x.indexrelid) AS
indexdefFROM pg_index x, pg_class c, pg_class i WHERE ((c.oid = x.indrelid) AND (i.oid = x.indexrelid));
 
1187c1186
< (20 rows)
---
> (19 rows)
======   foreign_key   ======
11a12
> NOTICE:  _outNode: don't know how to print type 726 
235a237
> NOTICE:  _outNode: don't know how to print type 726 

I guess the error on foreign_key is caused by -d 3 turned on(does this
hurt anything?) But what about the rules?

Linux RedHat 4.2, multibyte support enabled.
--
Tatsuo Ishii

Oops.

> I saw some errors on the regression test, and they are new to me.
> Here are the output from checkresults.
> 
> ======   rules   ======
> 1168d1167
> <  pg_indexes         | SELECT c.relname AS tablename, i.relname AS indexname, pg_get_indexdef(x.indexrelid) AS
indexdefFROM pg_index x, pg_class c, pg_class i WHERE ((c.oid = x.indrelid) AND (i.oid = x.indexrelid));
 
> 1187c1186
> < (20 rows)
> ---
> > (19 rows)
> ======   foreign_key   ======
> 11a12
> > NOTICE:  _outNode: don't know how to print type 726 
> 235a237
> > NOTICE:  _outNode: don't know how to print type 726 
> 
> I guess the error on foreign_key is caused by -d 3 turned on(does this
> hurt anything?) But what about the rules?
> 
> Linux RedHat 4.2, multibyte support enabled.

Forget about the rules failure. I was tweaking pg_log file, and that
was the problem. Initdb again and the error has gone.
--
Tatsuo Ishii

Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii@sra.co.jp> writes:
> I saw some errors on the regression test, and they are new to me.
> Here are the output from checkresults.

> ======   rules   ======
> 1168d1167
> <  pg_indexes         | SELECT c.relname AS tablename, i.relname AS indexname, pg_get_indexdef(x.indexrelid) AS
indexdefFROM pg_index x, pg_class c, pg_class i WHERE ((c.oid = x.indrelid) AND (i.oid = x.indexrelid));
 
> 1187c1186
> < (20 rows)
> ---
>> (19 rows)
> ======   foreign_key   ======
> 11a12
>> NOTICE:  _outNode: don't know how to print type 726 
> 235a237
>> NOTICE:  _outNode: don't know how to print type 726 

> I guess the error on foreign_key is caused by -d 3 turned on(does this
> hurt anything?) But what about the rules?

The NOTICEs are caused by a known omission: the foreign-key boys didn't
bother to add an outfuncs.c routine for node type FkConstraint.  Should
be pretty harmless AFAIK.  The rules discrepancy is much more
disturbing.  Is it repeatable?
        regards, tom lane