Обсуждение: Comments on patch for date_trunc( 'week', ... );

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка

Comments on patch for date_trunc( 'week', ... );

От
Robert Creager
Дата:
Per a brief conversation with Tom, I've created a patch for adding support for
'week' within the date_trunc function.

Within the patch I added a couple of test cases and associated target output,
and changed the documentation to add 'week' appropriately.

Comments?  Should I of bypassed this list and subscribed/posted to the patch
list?

Cheers,
Rob

--
 17:07:39 up 15 days, 46 min,  4 users,  load average: 2.18, 2.23, 2.27
Linux 2.4.21-0.13_test #60 SMP Sun Dec 7 17:00:02 MST 2003

Вложения

Re: Comments on patch for date_trunc( 'week', ... );

От
Robert Creager
Дата:
Hey Bruce,

I never saw the patch hit the hackers list.  Did any of you smart folks take a
look at it?

Cheers,
Rob

When grilled further on (Wed, 3 Mar 2004 13:58:02 -0500 (EST)),
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> confessed:

> 
> Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
> 
>     http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches
> 
> I will try to apply it within the next 48 hours.
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> Robert Creager wrote:
> -- Start of PGP signed section.
> > 
> > Per a brief conversation with Tom, I've created a patch for adding support
> > for'week' within the date_trunc function.
> > 
> > Within the patch I added a couple of test cases and associated target
> > output, and changed the documentation to add 'week' appropriately.
> > 
> > Comments?  Should I of bypassed this list and subscribed/posted to the patch
> > list?
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > Rob
> > 
> > -- 
> >  17:07:39 up 15 days, 46 min,  4 users,  load average: 2.18, 2.23, 2.27
> > Linux 2.4.21-0.13_test #60 SMP Sun Dec 7 17:00:02 MST 2003
> 
> [ Attachment, skipping... ]
> -- End of PGP section, PGP failed!
> 
> -- 
>   Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
>   pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
>   +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
>   +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
> 


-- 20:21:06 up 18 days,  3:59,  2 users,  load average: 1.52, 1.31, 1.25
Linux 2.4.21-0.13_test #60 SMP Sun Dec 7 17:00:02 MST 2003



Re: Comments on patch for date_trunc( 'week', ... );

От
Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Well, it must have hit the lists if I have put it in the patch queue, no?

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hey Bruce,

I never saw the patch hit the hackers list.  Did any of you smart folks take a
look at it?

Cheers,
Rob

When grilled further on (Wed, 3 Mar 2004 13:58:02 -0500 (EST)),
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> confessed:

>
> Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
>
>       http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches
>
> I will try to apply it within the next 48 hours.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> Robert Creager wrote:
> -- Start of PGP signed section.
> >
> > Per a brief conversation with Tom, I've created a patch for adding support
> > for'week' within the date_trunc function.
> >
> > Within the patch I added a couple of test cases and associated target
> > output, and changed the documentation to add 'week' appropriately.
> >
> > Comments?  Should I of bypassed this list and subscribed/posted to the patch
> > list?

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
 


Re: Comments on patch for date_trunc( 'week', ... );

От
Robert Creager
Дата:
When grilled further on (Wed, 3 Mar 2004 22:40:50 -0500 (EST)),
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> confessed:

> 
> Well, it must have hit the lists if I have put it in the patch queue, no?
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Hey Bruce,
> 
> I never saw the patch hit the hackers list.  Did any of you smart folks take a
> look at it?
> 

More emphasis on the latter, less on the former.  That was the gist of the
e-mail, to make sure someone else actually looked at it ;-)

Later,
Rob

-- 20:44:41 up 18 days,  4:22,  3 users,  load average: 1.04, 1.12, 1.15
Linux 2.4.21-0.13_test #60 SMP Sun Dec 7 17:00:02 MST 2003

Re: Comments on patch for date_trunc( 'week', ... );

От
Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Patch applied.  Thanks.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------


Robert Creager wrote:
-- Start of PGP signed section.
> 
> Per a brief conversation with Tom, I've created a patch for adding support for
> 'week' within the date_trunc function.
> 
> Within the patch I added a couple of test cases and associated target output,
> and changed the documentation to add 'week' appropriately.
> 
> Comments?  Should I of bypassed this list and subscribed/posted to the patch
> list?
> 
> Cheers,
> Rob
> 
> -- 
>  17:07:39 up 15 days, 46 min,  4 users,  load average: 2.18, 2.23, 2.27
> Linux 2.4.21-0.13_test #60 SMP Sun Dec 7 17:00:02 MST 2003

[ Attachment, skipping... ]
-- End of PGP section, PGP failed!

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073