Обсуждение: Tablespaces oddity?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка

Tablespaces oddity?

От
Philip Yarra
Дата:
Hi folks after discussing this on IRC today (thanks G_SabinoMullane!), I'm 
still surprised by this behaviour on 8.1.3:

pyarra=# create TABLESPACE spctables location '/mnt/pg_tables/data';
CREATE TABLESPACE
pyarra=# create table foo(id int) tablespace spctables;
CREATE TABLE
pyarra=# \d foo     Table "public.foo"Column |  Type   | Modifiers
--------+---------+-----------id     | integer |
Tablespace: "spctables"

So far, so good...

pyarra=# CREATE DATABASE spctest TABLESPACE spctables;
CREATE DATABASE
pyarra=# \c spctest;
You are now connected to database "spctest".
spctest=# create table foo(id int) tablespace spctables;
CREATE TABLE
spctest=# create table bar(id int);
CREATE TABLE
spctest=# \d foo     Table "public.foo"Column |  Type   | Modifiers
--------+---------+-----------id     | integer |

spctest=# \d bar     Table "public.bar"Column |  Type   | Modifiers
--------+---------+-----------id     | integer |

I hoped that these last two tables would also be listed as being on spctables.

I think the issue is that pg_class.reltablespace = 0 where these objects are 
created on the default tablespace for this database. I can find out which 
tablespace the objects are really on with:

select relname, COALESCE(t.spcname,(select spcname from pg_tablespace where 
oid = (select dattablespace from pg_database where datname 
=current_database()))) as tablespace from pg_class c left join pg_tablespace 
t on (t.oid = c.reltablespace)

Someone else might be able to see a better way to write this query, but I 
think it would be good if \d could show this information, when you really 
want to know which tablespace an object is on. 

Note also that \l won't show you the tablespace for a DB, so you need to query 
pg_database to even know which is the default tablespace for a DB. It's not 
impossible, just harder than it needs to be, I reckon.

Any thoughts?

Regards, Philip.

-- 

"Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place.
Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are,
by definition, not smart enough to debug it." - Brian W. Kernighan

-----------------
Utiba Pty Ltd 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by Utiba mail server and is 
believed to be clean.



Re: Tablespaces oddity?

От
Tom Lane
Дата:
Philip Yarra <philip@utiba.com> writes:
> Someone else might be able to see a better way to write this query, but I 
> think it would be good if \d could show this information, when you really 
> want to know which tablespace an object is on. 

If \d doesn't say anything then the table is in the database's default
tablespace.  I see nothing wrong with that, and I do object to
cluttering \d output with information that will be of no interest to
people not using tablespaces.

> Note also that \l won't show you the tablespace for a DB, so you need
> to query pg_database to even know which is the default tablespace for
> a DB.

I wouldn't object to adding default tablespace to \l output, or maybe \l+.
        regards, tom lane


Re: Tablespaces oddity?

От
Philip Yarra
Дата:
On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 01:36 am, Tom Lane wrote:
> Philip Yarra <philip@utiba.com> writes:
> > Someone else might be able to see a better way to write this query, but I
> > think it would be good if \d could show this information, when you really
> > want to know which tablespace an object is on.
>
> If \d doesn't say anything then the table is in the database's default
> tablespace.  I see nothing wrong with that, and I do object to
> cluttering \d output with information that will be of no interest to
> people not using tablespaces.

OK, how about on \d+, if the object is not on pg_default or pg_global, print 
the tablespace that this object is on? That way, people not using tablespaces 
won't ever see it.

> > Note also that \l won't show you the tablespace for a DB, so you need
> > to query pg_database to even know which is the default tablespace for
> > a DB.
>
> I wouldn't object to adding default tablespace to \l output, or maybe \l+.

OK, not fussed which one it's on, so long as it's there - this should do it 
for \l+

SELECT d.datname as "Name",   r.rolname as "Owner",   pg_catalog.pg_encoding_to_char(d.encoding) as "Encoding",
pg_catalog.obj_description(d.oid,'pg_database') as "Description",   t.spcname as "Tablespace"
 
FROM pg_catalog.pg_database d   LEFT JOIN pg_catalog.pg_roles r ON d.datdba = r.oid   LEFT JOIN
pg_catalog.pg_tablespacet on d.dattablespace = t.oid;
 

On a related note: is there a simple way to show all objects on a given 
tablespace? If not, would other people also see this as useful?

Regards, Philip.

-- 

"Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place.
Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are,
by definition, not smart enough to debug it." - Brian W. Kernighan

-----------------
Utiba Pty Ltd 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by Utiba mail server and is 
believed to be clean.



Re: Tablespaces oddity?

От
Philip Yarra
Дата:
On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 08:46 am, Philip Yarra wrote:
> OK, how about on \d+, if the object is not on pg_default or pg_global,
> print the tablespace that this object is on? That way, people not using
> tablespaces won't ever see it.

Tom, does this answer your objection? If so, I'll produce a patch for it.

Regards, Philip.

PS: sorry about duplicate post, accidentally sent from other email account.

-- 

"Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place.
Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are,
by definition, not smart enough to debug it." - Brian W. Kernighan

-----------------
Utiba Pty Ltd 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by Utiba mail server and is 
believed to be clean.



Re: Tablespaces oddity?

От
Philip Yarra
Дата:
On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 08:46 am, Philip Yarra wrote:
> OK, how about on \d+, if the object is not on pg_default or pg_global,
> print the tablespace that this object is on? That way, people not using
> tablespaces won't ever see it.

Tom, does this answer your objection? If so, I'll produce a patch for it.

Regards, Philip.