Обсуждение: CommitFest 2009-07 is Now Closed
The time is now Wed Jul 15 00:18:00 UTC 2009 and CommitFest 2009-07 is now closed. Please submit all new patches at: http://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/commitfest_view/open Reviewing assignments will be sent to pgsql-rrreviewers in the next few hours. I believe everyone who has volunteered to review is now a member of that mailing list; if you want to review and don't get a reviewing assignment by 04:00:00, please email me. If there are any stragglers out there who are still interesting in reviewing, it's not too late to speak up. There are still more patches than there are reviewers, and obviously it would be much better if it were the other way around. I will be asking the reviewers to please complete their initial review within 4 days, meaning by end of day on Saturday. I am sure that not everyone will be able hit that deadline, but it's good to have something to aim for, and the more people hit it the better our chances of getting a lot of good stuff done during this CommitFest. Once the initial round of reviews is complete, I will reassign all reviewers who still have bandwidth to new patches; I'm hoping that we'll eventually be able to get a couple of people helping with each of the big ones, but that won't be the case to start out, because I think it's important to make sure that everyone gets at least some feedback. ...Robert
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 8:55 PM, Tatsuo Ishii<ishii@postgresql.org> wrote: > Tsutomu was asking to add his patches to July commit festa: > > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-07/msg00782.php > > But it does not seem all subsequent replies agree that. What shall he > do? Just waits for next commitfest? Adding a patch to the CommitFest doesn't require permission. It's just asking that the patch be reviewed, not guaranteeing anything. Patch authors are supposed to add patches to the commitfest site themselves, but I will add this one. ...Robert
> > Tsutomu was asking to add his patches to July commit festa: > > > > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-07/msg00782.php > > > > But it does not seem all subsequent replies agree that. What shall he > > do? Just waits for next commitfest? > > Adding a patch to the CommitFest doesn't require permission. It's > just asking that the patch be reviewed, not guaranteeing anything. > Patch authors are supposed to add patches to the commitfest site > themselves, but I will add this one. Thanks! -- Tatsuo Ishii SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
Robert, Tsutomu was asking to add his patches to July commit festa: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-07/msg00782.php But it does not seem all subsequent replies agree that. What shall he do? Just waits for next commit festa? -- Tatsuo Ishii SRA OSS, Inc. Japan > The time is now Wed Jul 15 00:18:00 UTC 2009 and CommitFest 2009-07 is > now closed. Please submit all new patches at: > > http://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/commitfest_view/open > > Reviewing assignments will be sent to pgsql-rrreviewers in the next > few hours. I believe everyone who has volunteered to review is now a > member of that mailing list; if you want to review and don't get a > reviewing assignment by 04:00:00, please email me. If there are any > stragglers out there who are still interesting in reviewing, it's not > too late to speak up. There are still more patches than there are > reviewers, and obviously it would be much better if it were the other > way around. > > I will be asking the reviewers to please complete their initial review > within 4 days, meaning by end of day on Saturday. I am sure that not > everyone will be able hit that deadline, but it's good to have > something to aim for, and the more people hit it the better our > chances of getting a lot of good stuff done during this CommitFest. > Once the initial round of reviews is complete, I will reassign all > reviewers who still have bandwidth to new patches; I'm hoping that > we'll eventually be able to get a couple of people helping with each > of the big ones, but that won't be the case to start out, because I > think it's important to make sure that everyone gets at least some > feedback. > > ...Robert > > -- > Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
On Wednesday 15 July 2009 03:18:03 Robert Haas wrote: > The time is now Wed Jul 15 00:18:00 UTC 2009 and CommitFest 2009-07 is > now closed. I don't know about others, but I find this terminology confusing. The progression should be: (Not accepting submissions) -> Accepting submissions -> In progress -> Closed
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 10:03:20AM +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On Wednesday 15 July 2009 03:18:03 Robert Haas wrote: > > The time is now Wed Jul 15 00:18:00 UTC 2009 and CommitFest 2009-07 is > > now closed. > > I don't know about others, but I find this terminology confusing. The > progression should be: > > (Not accepting submissions) -> Accepting submissions -> In progress -> Closed Indeed, just reading the subject of Roberts mail had me confused for a while even though the body quickly sorted that out. Kristian. -- Kristian Larsson KLL-RIPE +46 704 910401 kll@spritelink.net
On Jul 15, 2009, at 3:11 AM, Kristian Larsson <kristian@spritelink.net> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 10:03:20AM +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >> On Wednesday 15 July 2009 03:18:03 Robert Haas wrote: >>> The time is now Wed Jul 15 00:18:00 UTC 2009 and CommitFest >>> 2009-07 is >>> now closed. >> >> I don't know about others, but I find this terminology confusing. >> The >> progression should be: >> >> (Not accepting submissions) -> Accepting submissions -> In progress >> -> Closed > > Indeed, just reading the subject of Roberts mail > had me confused for a while even though the body > quickly sorted that out. Yeah, sorry about that. I meant "closed to new submissions", but I should've thought more carefully about the terminology. I'll try to be more careful in the future. ...Robert