Обсуждение: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Remove dead ports
On ons, 2012-05-02 at 00:31 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes: > > Remove dead ports > > Checking this patch, I noticed that config.guess and config.sub harbor > most of the remaining references to those platforms, which reminded me: > don't we usually update those files from autoconf upstream before beta? Yes, once we know when beta is, we can move on that. ;-) Btw., I had intentionally kept the uses in ps_status.c and getrusage.c, because they remain useful in case someone wants to use these files for reference. But I guess that's debatable, because we no longer have a way to prove that those uses actually continue to work.
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes: > On ons, 2012-05-02 at 00:31 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> Checking this patch, I noticed that config.guess and config.sub harbor >> most of the remaining references to those platforms, which reminded me: >> don't we usually update those files from autoconf upstream before beta? > Yes, once we know when beta is, we can move on that. ;-) Next week, I thought. regards, tom lane
On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 01:15:48PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes: > > On ons, 2012-05-02 at 00:31 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > >> Checking this patch, I noticed that config.guess and config.sub harbor > >> most of the remaining references to those platforms, which reminded me: > >> don't we usually update those files from autoconf upstream before beta? > > > Yes, once we know when beta is, we can move on that. ;-) > > Next week, I thought. How are we handling the Monday release with everyone at PGCon? Was that resolved? -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. +
>> Next week, I thought. > > How are we handling the Monday release with everyone at PGCon? Was that > resolved? I have yet to see a confirmed date, guys. If we expect any support from the packagers and/or the advocacy volunteers, then people need at least a week's notice, probably more. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com
Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes: >> How are we handling the Monday release with everyone at PGCon? Was that >> resolved? > I have yet to see a confirmed date, guys. If we expect any support from > the packagers and/or the advocacy volunteers, then people need at least > a week's notice, probably more. I haven't seen anybody positively say we can't do a wrap next Thursday and release Monday, so I've been assuming that's what will happen. If there are reasons to think it won't work, let's hear 'em now. regards, tom lane