Обсуждение: single-user vs standalone in docs and messages
Some places in the docs and elog hints refer to "standalone" backends, while the official name as used in app-postgres.html is "single-user mode", and in fact "standalone" does not appear on that page.
This tries to standardize the other locations to use "single-user". I think I did the right thing with the message translation files, but I can't figure out how to test that.
I made no attempt to change code-comments, just the user-facing parts.
Cheers,
Jeff
Вложения
Jeff Janes escribió: > I think I did the right thing with the message translation files, but > I can't figure out how to test that. Don't do that. These files are automatically generated. Just leave them alone and translators will get to them in time. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 6:10 PM, Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com> wrote: > Some places in the docs and elog hints refer to "standalone" backends, while > the official name as used in app-postgres.html is "single-user mode", and in > fact "standalone" does not appear on that page. > > This tries to standardize the other locations to use "single-user". I think > I did the right thing with the message translation files, but I can't figure > out how to test that. > > I made no attempt to change code-comments, just the user-facing parts. I think you could tell people to use "single-user mode" instead of "a standalone backend", but telling them to use "a single-user backend" just seems weird. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
On Thu, 2013-06-13 at 15:10 -0700, Jeff Janes wrote: > Some places in the docs and elog hints refer to "standalone" backends, > while the official name as used in app-postgres.html is "single-user > mode", > and in fact "standalone" does not appear on that page. > > This tries to standardize the other locations to use "single-user". I > think I did the right thing with the message translation files, but I > can't > figure out how to test that. > > I made no attempt to change code-comments, just the user-facing > parts. committed with some adjustments