Обсуждение: old warning in docs

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка

old warning in docs

От
Andrew Dunstan
Дата:
Given that we have not supported releases older than 8.3 for quite a 
while, do we need to keep this in extend.sgml any longer?
  <caution>    <para>     Changing <varname>PG_CONFIG</varname> only works when building     against
<productname>PostgreSQL</productname>8.3 or later.     With older releases it does not work to set it to anything
except    <literal>pg_config</>; you must alter your <varname>PATH</>     to select the installation to build against.
 </para>   </caution>
 

cheers

andrew



Re: old warning in docs

От
David Fetter
Дата:
On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 07:51:44AM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> 
> Given that we have not supported releases older than 8.3 for quite a
> while, do we need to keep this in extend.sgml any longer?
> 
>   <caution>
>     <para>
>      Changing <varname>PG_CONFIG</varname> only works when building
>      against <productname>PostgreSQL</productname> 8.3 or later.
>      With older releases it does not work to set it to anything except
>      <literal>pg_config</>; you must alter your <varname>PATH</>
>      to select the installation to build against.
>     </para>
>    </caution>

I say "bin it."  That reminds me.  There are probably a lot of places
in the docs that refer to versions of PostgreSQL a good bit older than
8.3.  Will grep and patch as I get the time.

Cheers,
David.
-- 
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778  AIM: dfetter666  Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter      XMPP: david.fetter@gmail.com
iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate



Re: old warning in docs

От
Robert Haas
Дата:
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 7:51 AM, Andrew Dunstan
<andrew.dunstan@pgexperts.com> wrote:
> Given that we have not supported releases older than 8.3 for quite a while,
> do we need to keep this in extend.sgml any longer?

+1 for removing that (but only in master, not the back-branches).

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



Re: old warning in docs

От
Magnus Hagander
Дата:
<p dir="ltr"><br /> On Oct 8, 2013 6:27 PM, "Robert Haas" <<a
href="mailto:robertmhaas@gmail.com">robertmhaas@gmail.com</a>>wrote:<br /> ><br /> > On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at
7:51AM, Andrew Dunstan<br /> > <<a
href="mailto:andrew.dunstan@pgexperts.com">andrew.dunstan@pgexperts.com</a>>wrote:<br /> > > Given that we
havenot supported releases older than 8.3 for quite a while,<br /> > > do we need to keep this in extend.sgml any
longer?<br/> ><br /> > +1 for removing that (but only in master, not the back-branches).<br /> ><p
dir="ltr">+1,and definitely not in back branches. <p dir="ltr">/Magnus  

Re: old warning in docs

От
Bruce Momjian
Дата:
On Mon, Oct  7, 2013 at 08:43:27AM -0700, David Fetter wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 07:51:44AM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> >
> > Given that we have not supported releases older than 8.3 for quite a
> > while, do we need to keep this in extend.sgml any longer?
> >
> >   <caution>
> >     <para>
> >      Changing <varname>PG_CONFIG</varname> only works when building
> >      against <productname>PostgreSQL</productname> 8.3 or later.
> >      With older releases it does not work to set it to anything except
> >      <literal>pg_config</>; you must alter your <varname>PATH</>
> >      to select the installation to build against.
> >     </para>
> >    </caution>
>
> I say "bin it."  That reminds me.  There are probably a lot of places
> in the docs that refer to versions of PostgreSQL a good bit older than
> 8.3.  Will grep and patch as I get the time.

I have created the attached patch which removes many of the pre-8.0
references, and trims some of the 8.1-8.3 references.  There are
probably some of these that should be kept, but it is easier to show you
all the possibilities and we can trim down the removal list based on
feedback.

--
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + Everyone has their own god. +

Вложения

Re: old warning in docs

От
Robert Haas
Дата:
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> I have created the attached patch which removes many of the pre-8.0
> references, and trims some of the 8.1-8.3 references.  There are
> probably some of these that should be kept, but it is easier to show you
> all the possibilities and we can trim down the removal list based on
> feedback.

The changes to lobj.sgml seem pointless.  I would also vote for
keeping xindex.sgml as-is.  The rest of the changes seem like
improvements.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



Re: old warning in docs

От
Bruce Momjian
Дата:
On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 07:19:46PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> > I have created the attached patch which removes many of the pre-8.0
> > references, and trims some of the 8.1-8.3 references.  There are
> > probably some of these that should be kept, but it is easier to show you
> > all the possibilities and we can trim down the removal list based on
> > feedback.
>
> The changes to lobj.sgml seem pointless.  I would also vote for
> keeping xindex.sgml as-is.  The rest of the changes seem like
> improvements.

OK, done.  Updated patch attached.

--
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + Everyone has their own god. +

Вложения

Re: old warning in docs

От
Bruce Momjian
Дата:
On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 07:34:20PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 07:19:46PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> > > I have created the attached patch which removes many of the pre-8.0
> > > references, and trims some of the 8.1-8.3 references.  There are
> > > probably some of these that should be kept, but it is easier to show you
> > > all the possibilities and we can trim down the removal list based on
> > > feedback.
> > 
> > The changes to lobj.sgml seem pointless.  I would also vote for
> > keeping xindex.sgml as-is.  The rest of the changes seem like
> > improvements.
> 
> OK, done.  Updated patch attached.

Patch applied.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + Everyone has their own god. +