Обсуждение: re: Postodbc not working
Hi, I too have dl'd the postodbc 0.35 from postodbc.magenet.com and it doesn't work for me with Postgresql 6.3 _but_ it works with 6.2.x. So I think this 0.35 was compiled for the old 6.2.x. As I read in an older email, the internal communication has changed, and an odbcdriver that is intended to work with 6.3 shouldn't work with 6.2.x, or am I totally wrong? As I'm not in posession of either WatcomC++ nor MSVC, I can't compile the driver myself out of the sources combined with Postgresql 6.3. Could anybody be so kind and give it a try? rgds, Gottfried -- Legal Warning: Do NOT send unsolicited commercial email to me - consider this an official notice. "By US Code Title 47, Sec.227(a)(2)(B), a computer/modem/printer meets the definition of a telephone fax machine. By Sec.227(b)(1)(C), it is unlawful to send any unsolicited advertisement to such equipment. By Sec.227(b)(3)(C), a violation of the aforementioned Section is punishable by action to recover actual monetary loss, or $500, whichever is greater, for each violation."
On Thu, 26 Mar 1998, Gottfried HARASEK wrote: > Hi, > > I too have dl'd the postodbc 0.35 from postodbc.magenet.com and it > doesn't work for me with Postgresql 6.3 _but_ it works with 6.2.x. So I > think this 0.35 was compiled for the old 6.2.x. > > As I read in an older email, the internal communication has changed, and > an odbcdriver that is intended to work with 6.3 shouldn't work with > 6.2.x, or am I totally wrong? No, you are correct...there are some pretty major changes in there...
On Thu, 26 Mar 1998, The Hermit Hacker wrote: > On Thu, 26 Mar 1998, Gottfried HARASEK wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I too have dl'd the postodbc 0.35 from postodbc.magenet.com and it > > doesn't work for me with Postgresql 6.3 _but_ it works with 6.2.x. So I > > think this 0.35 was compiled for the old 6.2.x. > > > > As I read in an older email, the internal communication has changed, and > > an odbcdriver that is intended to work with 6.3 shouldn't work with > > 6.2.x, or am I totally wrong? > > No, you are correct...there are some pretty major changes in > there... Watch the contents of the include files. When I was working on the OS/2 client port (libpq and psql) I found that a couple of include files had older dates than their counterparts in 6.2.1. One item that stands out is PQsetdb changed from an extern to a #define. Vince. -- ========================================================================== Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSH email: vev@michvhf.com flame-mail: /dev/null # include <std/disclaimers.h> TEAM-OS2 Online Searchable Campground Listings http://www.camping-usa.com "I'm just not a fan of promoting stupidity! We have elected officials for that job!" -- Rock ==========================================================================