Обсуждение: Buildfarm error: Broken compatability with JDK 1.4
Hi, The JDBC buildfarm has been broken since Friday as I've discovered this morning (see http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_status.pl?member=piapiac). All branches (8.4,9.0,9.1 & HEAD) are failing with the same reason: compile: [javac] /home/ubuntu/buildarea/HEAD/pgjdbc/build.xml:125: warning: 'includeantruntime' was not set, defaulting to build.sysclasspath=last; set to false for repeatable builds [javac] Compiling 152 source files to /home/ubuntu/buildarea/HEAD/pgjdbc/build [javac] /home/ubuntu/buildarea/HEAD/pgjdbc/org/postgresql/ds/common/PGObjectFactory.java:119: cannot resolve symbol [javac] symbol : method parseBoolean (java.lang.String) [javac] location: class java.lang.Boolean [javac] ds.setBinaryTransfer(Boolean.parseBoolean(binaryTransfer)); [javac] ^ [javac] /home/ubuntu/buildarea/HEAD/pgjdbc/org/postgresql/jdbc2/AbstractJdbc2ResultSet.java:3129: cannot resolve symbol [javac] symbol : method valueOf (long) [javac] location: class java.lang.Long [javac] throw new PSQLException(GT.tr("Bad value for type {0} : {1}", new Object[]{targetType, Long.valueOf(val)}), [javac] ^ [javac] Note: Some input files use or override a deprecated API. [javac] Note: Recompile with -deprecation for details. [javac] 2 errors Both of these method calls - Boolean.parseBoolean() and Long.valueOf() - are introduced in JDK 1.5. Are we dropping support for 1.4? Given that the workaround to maintain 1.4 compatability is so simple (see attached patch) I would recommend maintaing support of 1.4. Regards, -- Mike Fowler Registered Linux user: 379787 The Call for Papers for is open for FLOSS UK, contact postgresql2012 AT flossuk DOT org for details.
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 9:17 AM, Mike Fowler <mike@mlfowler.com> wrote: > Hi, > > The JDBC buildfarm has been broken since Friday as I've discovered this > morning (see > http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_status.pl?member=piapiac). All > branches (8.4,9.0,9.1 & HEAD) are failing with the same reason: > > compile: > [javac] /home/ubuntu/buildarea/HEAD/pgjdbc/build.xml:125: warning: > 'includeantruntime' was not set, defaulting to > build.sysclasspath=last; set to false for repeatable builds > [javac] Compiling 152 source files to > /home/ubuntu/buildarea/HEAD/pgjdbc/build > [javac] > /home/ubuntu/buildarea/HEAD/pgjdbc/org/postgresql/ds/common/PGObjectFactory.java:119: > cannot resolve symbol > [javac] symbol : method parseBoolean (java.lang.String) > [javac] location: class java.lang.Boolean > [javac] > ds.setBinaryTransfer(Boolean.parseBoolean(binaryTransfer)); > [javac] ^ > [javac] > /home/ubuntu/buildarea/HEAD/pgjdbc/org/postgresql/jdbc2/AbstractJdbc2ResultSet.java:3129: > cannot resolve symbol > [javac] symbol : method valueOf (long) > [javac] location: class java.lang.Long > [javac] throw new PSQLException(GT.tr("Bad value for type > {0} : {1}", new Object[]{targetType, Long.valueOf(val)}), > [javac] > ^ > [javac] Note: Some input files use or override a deprecated API. > [javac] Note: Recompile with -deprecation for details. > [javac] 2 errors > > Both of these method calls - Boolean.parseBoolean() and Long.valueOf() - > are introduced in JDK 1.5. Are we dropping support for 1.4? Given that the > workaround to maintain 1.4 compatability is so simple (see attached patch) > I would recommend maintaing support of 1.4. I would agree that we want to keep support for 1.4 Miiko, I'm guessing this is mostly from your patches. Dave
Did I miss something ? I did not see a patch from Mike. Dave Cramer dave.cramer(at)credativ(dot)ca http://www.credativ.ca On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 9:46 AM, Mikko Tiihonen <mikko.tiihonen@nitorcreations.com> wrote: > On 09/26/2011 04:41 PM, Dave Cramer wrote: >> >> On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 9:17 AM, Mike Fowler<mike@mlfowler.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> The JDBC buildfarm has been broken since Friday as I've discovered this >>> morning (see >>> http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_status.pl?member=piapiac). All >>> branches (8.4,9.0,9.1& HEAD) are failing with the same reason: >>> >>> compile: >>> [javac] /home/ubuntu/buildarea/HEAD/pgjdbc/build.xml:125: warning: >>> 'includeantruntime' was not set, defaulting to >>> build.sysclasspath=last; set to false for repeatable builds >>> [javac] Compiling 152 source files to >>> /home/ubuntu/buildarea/HEAD/pgjdbc/build >>> [javac] >>> >>> /home/ubuntu/buildarea/HEAD/pgjdbc/org/postgresql/ds/common/PGObjectFactory.java:119: >>> cannot resolve symbol >>> [javac] symbol : method parseBoolean (java.lang.String) >>> [javac] location: class java.lang.Boolean >>> [javac] >>> ds.setBinaryTransfer(Boolean.parseBoolean(binaryTransfer)); >>> [javac] ^ >>> [javac] >>> >>> /home/ubuntu/buildarea/HEAD/pgjdbc/org/postgresql/jdbc2/AbstractJdbc2ResultSet.java:3129: >>> cannot resolve symbol >>> [javac] symbol : method valueOf (long) >>> [javac] location: class java.lang.Long >>> [javac] throw new PSQLException(GT.tr("Bad value for type >>> {0} : {1}", new Object[]{targetType, Long.valueOf(val)}), >>> [javac] >>> ^ >>> [javac] Note: Some input files use or override a deprecated API. >>> [javac] Note: Recompile with -deprecation for details. >>> [javac] 2 errors >>> >>> Both of these method calls - Boolean.parseBoolean() and Long.valueOf() - >>> are introduced in JDK 1.5. Are we dropping support for 1.4? Given that >>> the >>> workaround to maintain 1.4 compatability is so simple (see attached >>> patch) >>> I would recommend maintaing support of 1.4. >> >> >> I would agree that we want to keep support for 1.4 >> >> Mikko, I'm guessing this is mostly from your patches. > > Yes, my fault. I have tried to stay away from new APIs - the breakage was > unintentional. > > I'll be more careful in the future, but I do not have any older than 1.6 JVM > available > so it is very useful to have the build farm to catch these errors. > > If the patch from Mike does not get committed I'll create one tomorrow. > > -Mikko >
> Did I miss something ? I did not see a patch from Mike. > > Dave Cramer > > dave.cramer(at)credativ(dot)ca > http://www.credativ.ca It might help if I attached the patch, apologies! -- Mike Fowler Registered Linux user: 379787
> >> Did I miss something ? I did not see a patch from Mike. >> >> Dave Cramer >> >> dave.cramer(at)credativ(dot)ca >> http://www.credativ.ca > > It might help if I attached the patch, apologies! > How embarrassing. I'm using an uncopertive web client. The attach button is right next to the send button and I missed. The patch really is attached this time :-/ -- Mike Fowler Registered Linux user: 379787 The Call for Papers for is open for FLOSS UK, contact postgresql2012 AT flossuk DOT org for details.
Вложения
On 09/26/2011 04:41 PM, Dave Cramer wrote: > On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 9:17 AM, Mike Fowler<mike@mlfowler.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> The JDBC buildfarm has been broken since Friday as I've discovered this >> morning (see >> http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_status.pl?member=piapiac). All >> branches (8.4,9.0,9.1& HEAD) are failing with the same reason: >> >> compile: >> [javac] /home/ubuntu/buildarea/HEAD/pgjdbc/build.xml:125: warning: >> 'includeantruntime' was not set, defaulting to >> build.sysclasspath=last; set to false for repeatable builds >> [javac] Compiling 152 source files to >> /home/ubuntu/buildarea/HEAD/pgjdbc/build >> [javac] >> /home/ubuntu/buildarea/HEAD/pgjdbc/org/postgresql/ds/common/PGObjectFactory.java:119: >> cannot resolve symbol >> [javac] symbol : method parseBoolean (java.lang.String) >> [javac] location: class java.lang.Boolean >> [javac] >> ds.setBinaryTransfer(Boolean.parseBoolean(binaryTransfer)); >> [javac] ^ >> [javac] >> /home/ubuntu/buildarea/HEAD/pgjdbc/org/postgresql/jdbc2/AbstractJdbc2ResultSet.java:3129: >> cannot resolve symbol >> [javac] symbol : method valueOf (long) >> [javac] location: class java.lang.Long >> [javac] throw new PSQLException(GT.tr("Bad value for type >> {0} : {1}", new Object[]{targetType, Long.valueOf(val)}), >> [javac] >> ^ >> [javac] Note: Some input files use or override a deprecated API. >> [javac] Note: Recompile with -deprecation for details. >> [javac] 2 errors >> >> Both of these method calls - Boolean.parseBoolean() and Long.valueOf() - >> are introduced in JDK 1.5. Are we dropping support for 1.4? Given that the >> workaround to maintain 1.4 compatability is so simple (see attached patch) >> I would recommend maintaing support of 1.4. > > > I would agree that we want to keep support for 1.4 > > Mikko, I'm guessing this is mostly from your patches. Yes, my fault. I have tried to stay away from new APIs - the breakage was unintentional. I'll be more careful in the future, but I do not have any older than 1.6 JVM available so it is very useful to have the build farm to catch these errors. If the patch from Mike does not get committed I'll create one tomorrow. -Mikko