Обсуждение: Front End Languages for PostgreSQL
Does anybody have any solid information that says that one language is better as a front end to a PostgreSQL database over another, and why ? We are coming out of a PHP / MySQL environment, have adopted PostgreSQL, and are trying to decide which language would be best to use with PostgreSQL. Since the application has to be rewritten, we are considering lanuages like PHP and Java. The application is web-based.
* Van Ingen, Lane <lvaningen@ESNCC.com> [0223 20:23]:
> Does anybody have any solid information that says that one language is better as a front end to a PostgreSQL
> database over another, and why ?
>
> We are coming out of a PHP / MySQL environment, have adopted PostgreSQL, and are trying to decide which
> language would be best to use with PostgreSQL. Since the application has to be rewritten, we are considering
> lanuages like PHP and Java. The application is web-based.
Rails is great, if you don't mind learning Ruby.
Good postgres support too.
--
'Good news, everyone! I've taught the toaster to feel love!'
-- Prof. Farnsworth
Rasputin :: Jack of All Trades - Master of Nuns
Just curious. Is the reason for the change based on MySql or PHP or both. We are building an app on PHP PostgreSQL and I am curious. We have notr found any issues with PostgreSQL and PHP. We are using PEAR to abstract the DB from PHP which seems to be worth doing if we were ever to consider another DB platform. We have been able to change the underlieing DBMS with no PHP changes other than connect string used in PEAR though this was only for test purposes. Oisin ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dick Davies" <rasputnik@hellooperator.net> To: "Van Ingen, Lane" <lvaningen@ESNCC.com> Cc: "PostgreSQL novices" <pgsql-novice@postgresql.org> Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 18:13 Subject: Re: [NOVICE] Front End Languages for PostgreSQL > * Van Ingen, Lane <lvaningen@ESNCC.com> [0223 20:23]: > > Does anybody have any solid information that says that one language is better as a front end to a PostgreSQL > > database over another, and why ? > > > > We are coming out of a PHP / MySQL environment, have adopted PostgreSQL, and are trying to decide which > > language would be best to use with PostgreSQL. Since the application has to be rewritten, we are considering > > lanuages like PHP and Java. The application is web-based. > > Rails is great, if you don't mind learning Ruby. > Good postgres support too. > > -- > 'Good news, everyone! I've taught the toaster to feel love!' > -- Prof. Farnsworth > Rasputin :: Jack of All Trades - Master of Nuns > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command > (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo@postgresql.org) >
Van Ingen, Lane wrote: >Does anybody have any solid information that says that one language is better as a front end to a PostgreSQL database overanother, and why ? > I think this has more to do with the demands of the language, I have used it with both PHP, Python and C++. I prefer python (mod_python for apache) and C++ but this has nothing to do with the postgresql binding, but a lot about the language. >We are coming out of a PHP / MySQL environment, have adopted PostgreSQL, and are trying to decide which >language would be best to use with PostgreSQL. Since the application has to be rewritten, we are considering lanuages likePHP and Java. The application is web-based. > > Hmm, I think the DB (binding) is of no relevance regarding choice of language. The software model you are (planning to) using are more relevant, like : will you need a OO class model, and do you prefer exceptions for future error handling. The last thing to consider is the performance demands, but the DB binding has nothing to do with this. Hope this helps ... /BL
The reason for the change is not PHP; it is MySQL. We want some of the advanced functionality
that MySQL will not have until at least version 5 (whatever form it comes in; we keep reading that
some of the version 5 MySQL stuff may be 'basic' (whatever that means)). We need views, triggers,
stored procedures in mature form now.
The reason for the question from me is that we have been hearing that some languages work better
than others with postgres; don't know why, but it could be how tightly coupled it is, how well the
API(?) works with these other languages, etc. In other words, I think I am looking more for any
performance differences that are significant.
-----Original Message-----
From: Oisin Glynn [mailto:me@oisinglynn.com]
Sent: Wed 2/16/2005 7:08 PM
To: Dick Davies; Van Ingen, Lane
Cc: PostgreSQL novices
Subject: Re: [NOVICE] Front End Languages for PostgreSQL
Just curious.
Is the reason for the change based on MySql or PHP or both. We are building
an app on PHP PostgreSQL and I am curious.
We have notr found any issues with PostgreSQL and PHP.
We are using PEAR to abstract the DB from PHP which seems to be worth doing
if we were ever to consider another DB platform.
We have been able to change the underlieing DBMS with no PHP changes other
than connect string used in PEAR though this was only for test purposes.
Oisin
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dick Davies" <rasputnik@hellooperator.net>
To: "Van Ingen, Lane" <lvaningen@ESNCC.com>
Cc: "PostgreSQL novices" <pgsql-novice@postgresql.org>
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 18:13
Subject: Re: [NOVICE] Front End Languages for PostgreSQL
> * Van Ingen, Lane <lvaningen@ESNCC.com> [0223 20:23]:
> > Does anybody have any solid information that says that one language is
better as a front end to a PostgreSQL
> > database over another, and why ?
> >
> > We are coming out of a PHP / MySQL environment, have adopted PostgreSQL,
and are trying to decide which
> > language would be best to use with PostgreSQL. Since the application has
to be rewritten, we are considering
> > lanuages like PHP and Java. The application is web-based.
>
> Rails is great, if you don't mind learning Ruby.
> Good postgres support too.
>
> --
> 'Good news, everyone! I've taught the toaster to feel love!'
> -- Prof. Farnsworth
> Rasputin :: Jack of All Trades - Master of Nuns
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
> (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo@postgresql.org)
>
Performance is really the bottom line for us. Would you like to qualify your opinion further, using that
as the criteria?
-----Original Message-----
From: Bo Lorentsen [mailto:bl@netgroup.dk]
Sent: Thu 2/17/2005 2:22 AM
To: Van Ingen, Lane
Cc: pgsql-novice@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [NOVICE] Front End Languages for PostgreSQL
Van Ingen, Lane wrote:
>Does anybody have any solid information that says that one language is better as a front end to a PostgreSQL
databaseover another, and why ?
>
I think this has more to do with the demands of the language, I have
used it with both PHP, Python and C++. I prefer python (mod_python for
apache) and C++ but this has nothing to do with the postgresql binding,
but a lot about the language.
>We are coming out of a PHP / MySQL environment, have adopted PostgreSQL, and are trying to decide which
>language would be best to use with PostgreSQL. Since the application has to be rewritten, we are considering
lanuageslike PHP and Java. The application is web-based.
>
>
Hmm, I think the DB (binding) is of no relevance regarding choice of
language. The software model you are (planning to) using are more
relevant, like : will you need a OO class model, and do you prefer
exceptions for future error handling. The last thing to consider is the
performance demands, but the DB binding has nothing to do with this.
Hope this helps ...
/BL
Van Ingen, Lane wrote: >Performance is really the bottom line for us. Would you like to qualify your opinion further, using that >as the criteria? > > Performance in general, is a really big issue :-) But in this case, when we look at a programming language and its DB connectivity, we need to chose languages depending on the amount and type of work done while _processing_, not by the DB binding. The only performance issue in relation to a language binding are related to support for special DB features, but on the other side ... most DB API's are made as open source, and missing features can be added relativly easy (sometimes by just asking nicely) :-) So, what kind of performance are you working for ? Fast DB access, applicaiton modularity (OO), quick app. execution, concurrency execution (multi user on a webside) ? These things You need to deside, and then You know what to optimize for good performance. Hope this is not too confusing :-) /BL
Centuries ago, Nostradamus foresaw when lvaningen@ESNCC.com ("Van Ingen, Lane") would write:
> Does anybody have any solid information that says that one language
> is better as a front end to a PostgreSQL database over another, and
> why ?
Here lies Serious Flamage...
One of the strengths of PostgreSQL is that people have built mappings
to make it usable in conjunction with _numerous_ languages, often with
APIs specially suited to the language.
People have had good success using numerous languages; it would seem
very strange to me for any language to be provably "better" in this
fashion.
--
(reverse (concatenate 'string "moc.liamg" "@" "enworbbc"))
http://linuxdatabases.info/info/languages.html
Rules of the Evil Overlord #28. "My pet monster will be kept in a
secure cage from which it cannot escape and into which I could not
accidentally stumble." <http://www.eviloverlord.com/>