Обсуждение: TODO item: remove postmaster -o option

Hi,

attached is a patch against HEAD that removes the postmaster's -o
option. It passes make check on i386 Ubuntu 5.10. I sent an e-mail
earlier today asking about the status of this TODO item to -hackers.
No answers so far :)

Markus Bertheau

I not gotten to reply to your earlier email.  Removal of -o requires
that all the postgres flags be supported by the postmaster.  I think
Peter Eisentraut is working on a patch to merge the two binaries and the
conflicting options.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Markus Bertheau wrote:
> Hi,
>
> attached is a patch against HEAD that removes the postmaster's -o
> option. It passes make check on i386 Ubuntu 5.10. I sent an e-mail
> earlier today asking about the status of this TODO item to -hackers.
> No answers so far :)
>
> Markus Bertheau

[ Attachment, skipping... ]

>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
>        choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
>        match

--
  Bruce Momjian   http://candle.pha.pa.us
  SRA OSS, Inc.   http://www.sraoss.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

[Apologies to Bruce for the double send]

2006/3/5, Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>:
>
> I not gotten to reply to your earlier email.  Removal of -o requires
> that all the postgres flags be supported by the postmaster.  I think
> Peter Eisentraut is working on a patch to merge the two binaries and the
> conflicting options.

The docs say

"The use of this option is obsolete; all command-line options
for server processes can be specified directly on the
postmaster command line"

Markus Bertheau

"Markus Bertheau" <mbertheau.pg@googlemail.com> writes:
> attached is a patch against HEAD that removes the postmaster's -o
> option.

Removing the option without providing equivalent substitute
functionality is not what the TODO item has in mind :-(

Peter is working on something to clean up the problem properly:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2006-01/msg00239.php

            regards, tom lane

Markus Bertheau wrote:
> [Apologies to Bruce for the double send]
>
> 2006/3/5, Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>:
> >
> > I not gotten to reply to your earlier email.  Removal of -o requires
> > that all the postgres flags be supported by the postmaster.  I think
> > Peter Eisentraut is working on a patch to merge the two binaries and the
> > conflicting options.
>
> The docs say
>
> "The use of this option is obsolete; all command-line options
> for server processes can be specified directly on the
> postmaster command line"

Uh, is this true?  Peter?

--
  Bruce Momjian   http://candle.pha.pa.us
  SRA OSS, Inc.   http://www.sraoss.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

Markus Bertheau wrote:
> The docs say
>
> "The use of this option is obsolete; all command-line options
> for server processes can be specified directly on the
> postmaster command line"

First, note the use of "obsolete" -- there are better ways to achieve
what you want -- as opposed to "deprecated" -- the use is recommended
against (for some reason to be specified).  If we make a plan to remove
the -o option sometime, we should use the latter and announce our
intentions.  That needs to be discussed, though.

The above documentation is only in the development branch, so deriving a
justification for removing that option from that is premature anyway.

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/