Обсуждение: Re: [PORTS] NT-Compile-Hints

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка

Re: [PORTS] NT-Compile-Hints

От
Elmar.Haneke@gmx.de
Дата:
Bruce Momjian schrieb:
>
> > I did find two pitfalls in the NT-compilation:
> >
> > a) in "include\config.h" "HAVE_UNION_SEMUN" should be defined
> > as 1, the configure-script left it undefined.
> >
> > b) The cygnus-bindir has to be placed in path befor the
> > NT-directories, especially the sort.exe has to be take for
> > cygnus, not NT
> >
> > Especially b) results in an small note in the right place (unknown
> > parameter for sort) and an error-stop later.
> >
> > Elmar
> >
> >
>
> I have added item B.  Please tell me why the HAVE_UNION_SEMUN was not
> set properly for NT.  configure runs a test for that.  Any idea why it
> failed.

I did install the IPC-headers to /usr/local/include/sys
The check for semun does fail because of missing headers.
The later compile does find the headers.

Elmar

Re: [PORTS] NT-Compile-Hints

От
Bruce Momjian
Дата:
> > > Especially b) results in an small note in the right place (unknown
> > > parameter for sort) and an error-stop later.
> > >
> > > Elmar
> > >
> > >
> >
> > I have added item B.  Please tell me why the HAVE_UNION_SEMUN was not
> > set properly for NT.  configure runs a test for that.  Any idea why it
> > failed.
>
> I did install the IPC-headers to /usr/local/include/sys
> The check for semun does fail because of missing headers.
> The later compile does find the headers.

OK, how is the later compile different.  Do we need to add some special
compile flags?  Which ones?

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle
  maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

Re: [PORTS] NT-Compile-Hints

От
Elmar Haneke
Дата:
Bruce Momjian schrieb:
>
> > > > Especially b) results in an small note in the right place (unknown
> > > > parameter for sort) and an error-stop later.
> > > >
> > > > Elmar
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > I have added item B.  Please tell me why the HAVE_UNION_SEMUN was not
> > > set properly for NT.  configure runs a test for that.  Any idea why it
> > > failed.
> >
> > I did install the IPC-headers to /usr/local/include/sys
> > The check for semun does fail because of missing headers.
> > The later compile does find the headers.
>
> OK, how is the later compile different.  Do we need to add some special
> compile flags?  Which ones?

In template\cygwin32 i see

SRCH_INC:/usr/local/include

this does explicitely add /usr/local/include to the include-path in
the makefiles there is -I/usr/local/include added to the
compile-commands.

Elmar