Обсуждение: Assignments for Robert, Jaime, Kenneth, Jeff
Jeff: Are you up to reviewing GIN Fast Insert and B-Tree emulation for GIN? Robert: Can you do the Code Review for TABLE Command, then tackle Optimizing COPY with memchr() ? Jaime, can you test and review Magnus' "SSL cleanups/hostname verification" ? Kenneth, do you have access to a multicore server? If so, can you please try out Dunstan's "parallel restore"? If not, let me know, I'll reassign you. --Josh
On Fri, 2008-11-07 at 10:50 -0800, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Jeff: Are you up to reviewing GIN Fast Insert and B-Tree emulation for GIN?
Sure. The fast insert patch may be a challenge, but I'll try. I was
planning to look at the GIN Btree patch regardless.
Regards,
Jeff Davis
I have access to an 8-core Sun 4150. I will try out the parallel restore. Ken On Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 10:50:04AM -0800, Josh Berkus wrote: > > Jeff: Are you up to reviewing GIN Fast Insert and B-Tree emulation for GIN? > > Robert: Can you do the Code Review for TABLE Command, then tackle > Optimizing COPY with memchr() ? > > Jaime, can you test and review Magnus' "SSL cleanups/hostname verification" > ? > > Kenneth, do you have access to a multicore server? If so, can you please > try out Dunstan's "parallel restore"? If not, let me know, I'll reassign > you. > > --Josh > > > -- > Sent via pgsql-rrreviewers mailing list (pgsql-rrreviewers@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-rrreviewers >
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 3:50 PM, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote: > > Jaime, can you test and review Magnus' "SSL cleanups/hostname verification" > ? > i'm not at all familiar with SSL, i can make a try but i'm not sure... -- Atentamente, Jaime Casanova Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL Asesoría y desarrollo de sistemas Guayaquil - Ecuador Cel. +59387171157
Josh, I just posted my timings for the parallel restore patch and achieved a better than 2x improvement in restore times on a 4-core system. Do you have a new candidate for me to check? Also, I do not know what the best way to request that we include the small hash function patch that I submitted be included in the final commitfest. It actually only adds back the new/faster mixing functions that were stripped from the original patch because there had been no tests of the new functions. I submitted the test results with the final small patch. Do you have any ideas? Regards, Ken On Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 01:04:09PM -0600, Kenneth Marshall wrote: > I have access to an 8-core Sun 4150. I will try out the parallel > restore. > > Ken > On Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 10:50:04AM -0800, Josh Berkus wrote: > > > > Jeff: Are you up to reviewing GIN Fast Insert and B-Tree emulation for GIN? > > > > Robert: Can you do the Code Review for TABLE Command, then tackle > > Optimizing COPY with memchr() ? > > > > Jaime, can you test and review Magnus' "SSL cleanups/hostname verification" > > ? > > > > Kenneth, do you have access to a multicore server? If so, can you please > > try out Dunstan's "parallel restore"? If not, let me know, I'll reassign > > you. > > > > --Josh > > > > > > -- > > Sent via pgsql-rrreviewers mailing list (pgsql-rrreviewers@postgresql.org) > > To make changes to your subscription: > > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-rrreviewers > > > > -- > Sent via pgsql-rrreviewers mailing list (pgsql-rrreviewers@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-rrreviewers >
Kenneth, > I just posted my timings for the parallel restore patch and > achieved a better than 2x improvement in restore times on a > 4-core system. Do you have a new candidate for me to check? Can you try out the SQL/MED WIP patch and report on how sane its fuctionality seems to you? > Also, I do not know what the best way to request that we > include the small hash function patch that I submitted be > included in the final commitfest. It actually only adds back > the new/faster mixing functions that were stripped from the > original patch because there had been no tests of the new > functions. I submitted the test results with the final small > patch. Do you have any ideas? Re-submit it, with data, as a separate e-mail to hackers. Since it was part of a prior commitfest, it'll probably be accepted. -- --Josh Josh Berkus PostgreSQL San Francisco
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 02:50:50PM -0800, Josh Berkus wrote: > Kenneth, > > > I just posted my timings for the parallel restore patch and > > achieved a better than 2x improvement in restore times on a > > 4-core system. Do you have a new candidate for me to check? > > Can you try out the SQL/MED WIP patch and report on how sane its > fuctionality seems to you? > Okay, I will take a look. > > Also, I do not know what the best way to request that we > > include the small hash function patch that I submitted be > > included in the final commitfest. It actually only adds back > > the new/faster mixing functions that were stripped from the > > original patch because there had been no tests of the new > > functions. I submitted the test results with the final small > > patch. Do you have any ideas? > > Re-submit it, with data, as a separate e-mail to hackers. Since it was > part of a prior commitfest, it'll probably be accepted. > I already sent it in with the data. I just do not know what to do to keep it in sight for the 8.4 release. Thanks, Ken > -- > --Josh > > Josh Berkus > PostgreSQL > San Francisco > > -- > Sent via pgsql-rrreviewers mailing list (pgsql-rrreviewers@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-rrreviewers >