Gets my vote. Should we also consider doing this for Perl too? I turn them
all on in my installation. I don't use either Perl or TCL yet but want to
make sure they are available if 1) I ever want to or 2) a need arises that
is would be better suited to either Perl or TCL.
Thanks, Michael D.
-----Original Message-----From: jwieck@debis.com [SMTP:jwieck@debis.com]Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 1999 1:35 AMTo:
alewis@themecca.netCc: apendleton@vgsinc.com; pgsql-sql@hub.orgSubject: Re: [SQL] plpgsql error
>> Edit:
/usr/src/pgsql/postgresql-6.4.2/src/pl/plpgsql/src/mklang.sql>> Change: as '${exec_prefix}/lib/plpgsql.so'> to: as
'/usr/local/pgsql/lib/plpgsql.so'>>Then: psql your_db < mklang.sql>> This should really be part of the documentation as
Iwasted two
days on> this same problem a few weeks back.
And this became IMHO an FAQ. Should we avoid it by installing PL/pgSQL and PL/Tcl (if built) by default in the
template1 database during intidb? Installing it in template1 would have the effect that it will be
available after every createdb.
Jan
--
#======================================================================## It's easier to get forgiveness for being
wrongthan for being
right. ## Let's break this rule - forgive me.
##======================================== jwieck@debis.com (Jan
Wieck) #