On Sat, 2005-03-12 at 19:59 -0500, Eric J. Schwarzenbach wrote:
> I'd just like to point out a flow in the searching on
> archives.postgresql.org. It seems to be searching not just the messages
> but the web pages of the archives that show the messages. This makes
> certain searches useless. For example in trying to search on unicode and
> cygwin in pg-hackers, I get a list of results that have no relevance to
> cygwin. The search results will look like the following, in which one
> sees the word Cygwin highlighted as a hit.
This has now been fixed.
Thank you for your patience, and for reporting this.
>
> 31. Re: UTF8 or Unicode [0.00002]
>
> ...Admin PgSQL - Advocacy PgSQL - Announce PgSQL - Benchmarks PgSQL
> - Bugs PgSQL - Chat PgSQL - Committers PgSQL - Cygwin PgSQL - Docs PgSQL
> - General PgSQL - Hackers PgSQL......pgsql-announce Users Lists
> pgsql-admin pgsql-advocacy pgsql-benchmarks pgsql-bugs pgsql-chat
> pgsql-docs pgsql-cygwin pgsql-general pgsql-interfaces pgsql-jdbc
> pgsql-jobs pgsql-novice pgsql-odbc ......
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2005-02/msg00588.php, 13
> Kb [Cached]
>
>
>
> I could not figure out where that hit was coming from at first as I
> didn't even see the text of "Cygwin PgSQL" on the page anywhere when I
> clicked to the message. A View source made it apparent. This hit was on
> text in the drop down box for "Search in" in the search form at the top
> of the page!!! This makes the archives pretty much unsearchable for any
> words that occur in any of the html surrounding the actual messages on
> the archives site.
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
--
John Hansen <john@geeknet.com.au>
GeekNET