Обсуждение: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make psql's \set display variables inalphabetical order.
On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 04:25:25PM +0000, Tom Lane wrote: > Make psql's \set display variables in alphabetical order. This is a substantial usability improvement which nevertheless is hard to imagine changes things that scripts relied on. I think it's worth back-patching. Best, David. -- David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/ Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com Remember to vote! Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> writes:
> On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 04:25:25PM +0000, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Make psql's \set display variables in alphabetical order.
> This is a substantial usability improvement which nevertheless is hard
> to imagine changes things that scripts relied on. I think it's worth
> back-patching.
I'm not that excited about it personally, but I agree it would be unlikely
to break anything. Other votes?
regards, tom lane
Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make psql's \set display variablesin alphabetical order.
От
Andres Freund
Дата:
On 2017-02-01 12:59:36 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > David Fetter <david@fetter.org> writes: > > On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 04:25:25PM +0000, Tom Lane wrote: > >> Make psql's \set display variables in alphabetical order. > > > This is a substantial usability improvement which nevertheless is hard > > to imagine changes things that scripts relied on. I think it's worth > > back-patching. > > I'm not that excited about it personally, but I agree it would be unlikely > to break anything. Other votes? -0.5 - I see very little reason to backpatch this over dozes of other changes. - Andres
On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 1:08 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote: > On 2017-02-01 12:59:36 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: >> David Fetter <david@fetter.org> writes: >> > On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 04:25:25PM +0000, Tom Lane wrote: >> >> Make psql's \set display variables in alphabetical order. >> >> > This is a substantial usability improvement which nevertheless is hard >> > to imagine changes things that scripts relied on. I think it's worth >> > back-patching. >> >> I'm not that excited about it personally, but I agree it would be unlikely >> to break anything. Other votes? > > -0.5 - I see very little reason to backpatch this over dozes of other > changes. I'll vote -1. I don't think this is a bug fix. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 04:38:59PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote: > On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 1:08 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote: > > On 2017-02-01 12:59:36 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > >> David Fetter <david@fetter.org> writes: > >> > On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 04:25:25PM +0000, Tom Lane wrote: > >> >> Make psql's \set display variables in alphabetical order. > >> > >> > This is a substantial usability improvement which nevertheless is hard > >> > to imagine changes things that scripts relied on. I think it's worth > >> > back-patching. > >> > >> I'm not that excited about it personally, but I agree it would be unlikely > >> to break anything. Other votes? > > > > -0.5 - I see very little reason to backpatch this over dozes of other > > changes. > > I'll vote -1. I don't think this is a bug fix. I withdraw my suggestion. Best, David. -- David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/ Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com Remember to vote! Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate