Обсуждение: Upgrade check failed from 11.5 to 12.1

"Lu, Dan" <Dan.Lu@sig.com> writes:
> I am trying to upgrade an instance of PostgreSQL in unix from 11.5 to 12.1.

> UNIX:> pg_upgrade -d /hostname/pg/dpoc/data -D /hostname/pg/dpoc/data -b /hostname/pg/PostgreSQL-11.5/bin -B
/hostname/pg/PostgreSQL-12.1/bin-p 5432 -P 9432 -c -v 

No, you can't use the same directory to hold old and new versions at the
same time.  After you're done with the upgrade, you could move the new
data directory to be where the old one had been.

            regards, tom lane

Thanks for catching that.  Typo on my end.

Now I am getting this.

Performing Consistency Checks on Old Live Server
------------------------------------------------
Checking cluster versions                                   ok

old and new pg_controldata WAL segment sizes are invalid or do not match
Failure, exiting

I found the setting in the current version of the instance via "show all" as "wal_segment_size                       |
16MB".  I guess my new instance should be "16MB" as well when running this "initdb --wal-segsize=16 -D
/hostname/pg/NewInstance/data"?

-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Sent: Friday, December 18, 2020 4:55 PM
To: Lu, Dan <Dan.Lu@sig.com>
Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Upgrade check failed from 11.5 to 12.1

"Lu, Dan" <Dan.Lu@sig.com> writes:
> I am trying to upgrade an instance of PostgreSQL in unix from 11.5 to 12.1.

> UNIX:> pg_upgrade -d /hostname/pg/dpoc/data -D /hostname/pg/dpoc/data
> -b /hostname/pg/PostgreSQL-11.5/bin -B
> /hostname/pg/PostgreSQL-12.1/bin -p 5432 -P 9432 -c -v

No, you can't use the same directory to hold old and new versions at the same time.  After you're done with the
upgrade,you could move the new data directory to be where the old one had been. 

                        regards, tom lane

________________________________

IMPORTANT: The information contained in this email and/or its attachments is confidential. If you are not the intended
recipient,please notify the sender immediately by reply and immediately delete this message and all its attachments.
Anyreview, use, reproduction, disclosure or dissemination of this message or any attachment by an unintended recipient
isstrictly prohibited. Neither this message nor any attachment is intended as or should be construed as an offer,
solicitationor recommendation to buy or sell any security or other financial instrument. Neither the sender, his or her
employernor any of their respective affiliates makes any warranties as to the completeness or accuracy of any of the
informationcontained herein or that this message or any of its attachments is free of viruses. 

On 12/18/20 2:56 PM, Lu, Dan wrote:
> Thanks for catching that.  Typo on my end.
> 
> Now I am getting this.
> 
> Performing Consistency Checks on Old Live Server
> ------------------------------------------------
> Checking cluster versions                                   ok
> 
> old and new pg_controldata WAL segment sizes are invalid or do not match
> Failure, exiting
> 
> I found the setting in the current version of the instance via "show all" as "wal_segment_size
|16MB".   I guess my new instance should be "16MB" as well when running this "initdb --wal-segsize=16 -D
/hostname/pg/NewInstance/data"?
> 

Well the default is 16MB so you should not have to set it.

What does:

pg_controldata -D <11.5 data dir>

pg_controldata -D <12.1 data dir>

show for the setting Bytes per WAL segment: ?


-- 
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@aklaver.com

On 12/19/20 8:13 AM, Lu, Dan wrote:

Please do not top post. Convention on this list is bottom/inline posting.
> Thanks Adrian.
> 
> This is what I am seeing.
> 
> postgresdbad:dpoc:pgdbadevbal800:> pg_controldata -D 
> /hostname/pg/dev12upg/data | grep -i "Bytes per WAL segment"
> 
> Bytes per WAL segment: 131072

Well that would be the problem.

Did someone manually change --wal-segsize during initdb or pg_ctl init?

In any case that is not going to work. I'm assuming the 12 instance is 
not in use at this time. If so I would do the initdb again after 
clearing the data directory. Don't use the --wal-segsize, it will 
default to 16MB. Then check with pg_controldata to make sure the correct 
size is set.

> 
> postgresdbad:dpoc:pgdbadevbal800:> pg_controldata -D 
> /hostname/pg/dpoc/data | grep -i "Bytes per WAL segment"
> 
> Bytes per WAL segment: 16777216
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>
> Sent: Saturday, December 19, 2020 10:28 AM
> To: Lu, Dan <Dan.Lu@sig.com>; Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
> Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: Upgrade check failed from 11.5 to 12.1
> 
> On 12/18/20 2:56 PM, Lu, Dan wrote:
> 
>  > Thanks for catching that.  Typo on my end.
> 
>  >
> 
>  > Now I am getting this.
> 
>  >
> 
>  > Performing Consistency Checks on Old Live Server
> 
>  > ------------------------------------------------
> 
>  > Checking cluster versions                                   ok
> 
>  >
> 
>  > old and new pg_controldata WAL segment sizes are invalid or do not
> 
>  > match Failure, exiting
> 
>  >
> 
>  > I found the setting in the current version of the instance via "show 
> all" as "wal_segment_size                       | 16MB".   I guess my 
> new instance should be "16MB" as well when running this "initdb 
> --wal-segsize=16 -D /hostname/pg/NewInstance/data"?
> 
>  >
> 
> Well the default is 16MB so you should not have to set it.
> 
> What does:
> 
> pg_controldata -D <11.5 data dir>
> 
> pg_controldata -D <12.1 data dir>
> 
> show for the setting Bytes per WAL segment: ?
> 
> --
> 
> Adrian Klaver
> 
> adrian.klaver@aklaver.com <mailto:adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> IMPORTANT: The information contained in this email and/or its 
> attachments is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, 
> please notify the sender immediately by reply and immediately delete 
> this message and all its attachments. Any review, use, reproduction, 
> disclosure or dissemination of this message or any attachment by an 
> unintended recipient is strictly prohibited. Neither this message nor 
> any attachment is intended as or should be construed as an offer, 
> solicitation or recommendation to buy or sell any security or other 
> financial instrument. Neither the sender, his or her employer nor any of 
> their respective affiliates makes any warranties as to the completeness 
> or accuracy of any of the information contained herein or that this 
> message or any of its attachments is free of viruses.


-- 
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@aklaver.com