Re: Can the string literal syntax for function definitions please be dropped ?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Greg Sabino Mullane
Тема Re: Can the string literal syntax for function definitions please be dropped ?
Дата
Msg-id 01841001080ea2fa60443775653b5255@biglumber.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Can the string literal syntax for function definitions please be dropped ?  (Timothy Madden <terminatorul@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Can the string literal syntax for function definitions please be dropped ?  (Timothy Madden <terminatorul@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-general
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160

> There is a SQL standard for this, and other DBMS look like they found a way
>
> How come it can not be done ?

It *can* be done, but it won't be done. At least not by default. You might
get better traction if you perhaps argue for a flag to pg_dump to
exhibit the behavior you want. It has a small chance of being accepted,
but a much greater chance than changing the default behavior.

- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg@turnstep.com
End Point Corporation
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200910251638
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iEYEAREDAAYFAkrkt2oACgkQvJuQZxSWSshyYwCcCRozshAfS22KtJJqoLmJdOsx
X9IAmwYedkEyw819R6P0FZXVgskefaR4
=4oy5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Adrian Klaver
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Can the string literal syntax for function definitions please be dropped ?
Следующее
От: Timothy Madden
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Can the string literal syntax for function definitions please be dropped ?