Re: reindex/vacuum locking/performance?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Neil Conway
Тема Re: reindex/vacuum locking/performance?
Дата
Msg-id 1065397835.471.17.camel@tokyo
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: reindex/vacuum locking/performance?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: reindex/vacuum locking/performance?  (Jeff <threshar@torgo.978.org>)
Re: reindex/vacuum locking/performance?  (Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>)
Список pgsql-performance
On Sun, 2003-10-05 at 19:43, Tom Lane wrote:
> This would be relatively easy to fix as far as our own buffering is
> concerned, but the thing that's needed to make it really useful is
> to prevent caching of seqscan-read pages in the kernel disk buffers.

True.

> I don't know any portable way to do that :-(

For the non-portable way of doing this, are you referring to O_DIRECT?

Even if it isn't available everywhere, it might be worth considering
this at least for the platforms on which it is supported.

-Neil



В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: reindex/vacuum locking/performance?
Следующее
От: Andrew Sullivan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: reindex/vacuum locking/performance?