Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Joshua D. Drake
Тема Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?
Дата
Msg-id 1216994580.16378.2.camel@jd-laptop
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?  ("Asko Oja" <ascoja@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Fri, 2008-07-25 at 09:37 +0300, Asko Oja wrote:
> Hi
> 
> One of reasons to get PL/proxy into core is to make it available to
> Windows users also.
> The idea is to get to the situation 
> 
> createlang plproxy mydb
> 
> If we can achieve this without putting plproxy into core then i would
> like to hear how.

If the installer project wants to use it on Windows they can. Of course
that assumes that it runs on windows (I have no idea if it does).

Joshua D. Drake

-- 
The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/ 
PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
United States PostgreSQL Association: http://www.postgresql.us/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate





В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [RFC] Unsigned integer support.
Следующее
От: Andrew Dunstan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?