Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Andrew Dunstan
Тема Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?
Дата
Msg-id 4889E07D.1090602@dunslane.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?  ("Asko Oja" <ascoja@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers

Asko Oja wrote:
> Hi
>
> One of reasons to get PL/proxy into core is to make it available to 
> Windows users also.
> The idea is to get to the situation
>
> createlang plproxy mydb
>
> If we can achieve this without putting plproxy into core then i would 
> like to hear how.

The same way you would for any other module. This is a non-argument.

If you want to be able to do it without building your own, then you 
would need to ask the Windows Installer guys (Dave and Magnus) to 
include it - they already include lots of non-core stuff, including at 
least one PL, IIRC.


cheers

andrew


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Joshua D. Drake"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?
Следующее
От: "Xiao Meng"
Дата:
Сообщение: [patch] gsoc, improving hash index v2