Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> Uh, was this ever addressed? I don't see the patch applied or the code
> in this area modified.
This patch as-is would surely be disastrous: having LockAcquire
try to open the relcache entry for the thing we're trying to lock
is going to be circular in at least some cases. I'm not convinced
that there's a problem worth solving here, but if there is, it'd
have to be done in some other way.
regards, tom lane