On Thu, 2 May 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
> Paul M Foster <paulf@quillandmouse.com> writes:
> > On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 08:42:20PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Hmm. So does this one. You sure you're not inserting that yourself?
>
> > Guaranteed. I'm using mutt on Red Hat 7.2, with no provision for
> > massaging outbound mail that way.
>
> Nonetheless, *something* in your outgoing mail path is sticking in the
> errors-to header. It's not postgresql.org (unless you think that that
> machine is singling you out for special mistreatment). Given the
> header ordering:
>
> Received: from glatton.cnchost.com (glatton.cnchost.com [207.155.248.47])
> by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE90A4758DD
> for <pgsql-general@postgresql.org>; Thu, 2 May 2002 23:15:42 -0400 (EDT)
> Received: from quillandmouse.com (tamqfl1-ar4-4-47-193-218.tamqfl1.dsl-verizon.net [4.47.193.218])
> by glatton.cnchost.com
> id XAA19197; Thu, 2 May 2002 23:15:47 -0400 (EDT)
> [ConcentricHost SMTP Relay 1.14]
> Errors-To: <paulf@quillandmouse.com>
> Received: from paulf by quillandmouse.com with local (Exim 3.32 #1)
> id 173TYG-0005eH-00
> for pgsql-general@postgresql.org; Thu, 02 May 2002 23:16:08 -0400
> Date: Thu, 2 May 2002 23:16:03 -0400
> From: Paul M Foster <paulf@quillandmouse.com>
> To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
>
> I'd be inclined to bet that glatton.cnchost.com is the culprit.
> But you shouldn't rule out the possibility that it's your own
> machine doing it.
Actually, I'd say its quillandmouse.com ... from what I believe you said
in anothe rmessage, the first thing that the MTA does is adds the
Received: header, after which it would add Errors-To: before sending on to
the next one ... no? Which means that its getting added *before*
glatton.cnchost.com ...
So, unless postgresql.org is rewritting the Received headers, its being
added before it reaches us ... and I just looked at your full headers, and
there is no Errors-To: line added there ...
Is it something that Exim adds in?