Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> >Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> >>Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> >>>On Wed, 23 Aug 2006, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>In any case I don't see any reason to let the broken software continue
> >>>>to be broken. Surely there must be an updated version which corrects
> >>>>this bug? A patch at least? I mean, I can't be the only one
> >>>>complaining about it.
> >>>Based on this thread, and the fact that you are the first to have ever
> >>>noticed/commented about it ... ya, you are the only one complaining
> >>>about it :)
> >>Honestly, it may be time we start looking at mailman.
> >
> >Please don't, unless Majordomo is really broken and unfixed (i.e. there
> >isn't a newer version with the bug fixed). What version are we running?
>
> From what I can tell Majordomo isn't even supported any longer.
> Secondly we get some better management (not great but better) interfaces
> with mailman.
>
> Mailman is a supported, large, active, FOSS community project that is
> battle tested in the current field much more so then Majordomo. Holding
> on with a dying breaths to old software is silly.
Can Mailman do moderation over email? If it can do that, then I'm all
for it. If it can't, which was the case last time I checked (more than
a year ago or two, I admit), then I repeat my plea that it's not done.
Moderation over www is a PITA. My MUA allows me to accept/reject a
message in a single keystroke. If I had to fetch a webpage any time I
wanted to approve a post I'd abandon the job pretty quickly.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.