Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>>> On Wed, 23 Aug 2006, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>>>
>>>> In any case I don't see any reason to let the broken software continue
>>>> to be broken. Surely there must be an updated version which corrects
>>>> this bug? A patch at least? I mean, I can't be the only one
>>>> complaining about it.
>>> Based on this thread, and the fact that you are the first to have ever
>>> noticed/commented about it ... ya, you are the only one complaining
>>> about it :)
>> Honestly, it may be time we start looking at mailman.
>
> Please don't, unless Majordomo is really broken and unfixed (i.e. there
> isn't a newer version with the bug fixed). What version are we running?
From what I can tell Majordomo isn't even supported any longer.
Secondly we get some better management (not great but better) interfaces
with mailman.
Mailman is a supported, large, active, FOSS community project that is
battle tested in the current field much more so then Majordomo. Holding
on with a dying breaths to old software is silly.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/