Re: [HACKERS] Hash Functions

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Andres Freund
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Hash Functions
Дата
Msg-id 20170514200603.p3jh4xeir2yd5onu@alap3.anarazel.de
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Hash Functions  (Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Hash Functions  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: [HACKERS] Hash Functions  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 2017-05-14 15:59:09 -0400, Greg Stark wrote:
> Personally while I would like to avoid code that actively crashes or
> fails basic tests on Vax

I personally vote for simply refusing to run/compile on non-IEEE
platforms, including VAX.  The benefit of even trying to get that right,
not to speak of actually testing, seems just not there.

> even I don't think we need to worry about
> replication or federated queries in a heterogeneous environment where
> some servers are Vaxen and some are modern hardware. That seems a bit
> far-fetched.

Imo there's little point in trying to delineate some subset that we want
to support on platforms that are 20 years out of date.  Either we do, or
don't. And since there's no point aside of some intellectual
curiosity...

On the other hand, I don't believe my opinion that requiring hashing to
be portable is unrealistic, is meaningfully affected by disallowing
non-IEEE floats.


Greetings,

Andres Freund



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Pavel Stehule
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] issue: record or row variable cannot be part ofmultiple-item INTO list
Следующее
От: Peter Geoghegan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Hash Functions