Re: [HACKERS] Hash Functions

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Hash Functions
Дата
Msg-id 20170515030013.GB30604@momjian.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Hash Functions  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Hash Functions  (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 01:06:03PM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2017-05-14 15:59:09 -0400, Greg Stark wrote:
> > Personally while I would like to avoid code that actively crashes or
> > fails basic tests on Vax
> 
> I personally vote for simply refusing to run/compile on non-IEEE
> platforms, including VAX.  The benefit of even trying to get that right,
> not to speak of actually testing, seems just not there.

Do we even know that floats are precise enough to determine the
partition.  For example, if you have 6.000000001, is it possible for
that to be 5.9999999 on some systems?  Are IEEE systems all the same for
these values?  I would say we should disallow any approximate date type
for partitioning completely.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I.  As I am, so you will be. +
+                      Ancient Roman grave inscription +



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] PG 10 release notes
Следующее
От: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Race conditions with WAL sender PID lookups