Re: Remaining calls of heap_close/heap_open in the tree

Hi,

On 2019-10-17 10:47:06 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> I have just bumped into $subject, and we now use the table_*
> equivalents in the code.  Any objections to the simple patch attached
> to clean up that?

They're not really "remaining", as much as having been introduced after
the introduction of table_open()/close()...

Wonder if it's worth removing the backward compat ones from master? I
don't quite think so, but...

Greetings,

Andres Freund