Greetings,
* Ravi Krishna (sravikrishna@comcast.net) wrote:
> > Generally speaking, I discourage having lots of databases under one PG
> > cluster for exactly these kinds of reasons. PG's individual clusters
> > are relatively lightweight, after all.
>
> Plus PG does not directly support cross database queries using 3 part name, something
> sqlserver excels at.
Eh, that's something that I think we should be looking at supporting, by
using FDWs, but I haven't tried to figure out how hard it'd be.
Thanks,
Stephen