On Fri, Dec 08, 2023 at 09:55:58AM +1300, Thomas Munro wrote:
> Oh, wow. Nice detective work! Thank you for figuring that out.
+1
> Now we have the question of whether to go forwards (commit the "socket
> table" thing), or backwards (revert 04a09ee for now to clear the CI
> failures). I don't love the hidden complexity of the socket table and
> am not in a hurry to commit it, but I don't currently see another
> way... on the other hand we have other CI flapping due to that problem
> too so reverting 04a09ee would be sweeping problems under the carpet.
> I still need to process your feedback/discoveries on that other thread
> and it may take a few weeks for me to get to it.
I don't think we need to revert 04a09ee provided the issue is unrelated and
a fix is in development.
--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com