Re: Importance of re-index

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Importance of re-index
Дата
Msg-id 27345.1154646192@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Importance of re-index  (Scott Marlowe <smarlowe@g2switchworks.com>)
Ответы Re: Importance of re-index  (Scott Marlowe <smarlowe@g2switchworks.com>)
Список pgsql-general
Scott Marlowe <smarlowe@g2switchworks.com> writes:
> Reindex was originally
> designed to fix broken indexes, and, at least in earlier encarnations,
> should something stop it in the middle of reindexing I believe it is
> possible to be left with no index.

That was once true but these days reindex is perfectly crash-safe.  The
only case where it's not is where you want to reindex a shared catalog's
index (eg one of pg_database's), and we don't let you do that in
multiuser mode anyway.

            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Ron Johnson
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Importance of re-index
Следующее
От: John Sidney-Woollett
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Best Procedural Language?