Re: Application name patch - v2

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Application name patch - v2
Дата
Msg-id 28467.1256138748@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Application name patch - v2  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Ответы Re: Application name patch - v2  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Re: Application name patch - v2  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> FWIW, I would prefer PGAPPNAME to PGAPPLICATIONNAME which is what

> We don't usually use abbreviations, so how about PGCLIENTNAME  or some such?

Not sure I believe that argument.  Among the set of existing libpq
environment variables I see

PGHOSTADDR
PGSSLCERT
PGSSLCRL
PGKRBSRVNAME
PGTZ
PGSYSCONFDIR

so it can hardly be said that there's a policy of avoiding
abbreviations.  PGCLIENTNAME would be better than PGAPPLICATIONNAME
I guess, but I still prefer the other.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andrew Dunstan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Application name patch - v2
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Application name patch - v2