Re: Application name patch - v2

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: Application name patch - v2
Дата
Msg-id 603c8f070910210829h481ebd6g18e693af43a75061@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Application name patch - v2  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Application name patch - v2  (Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 11:25 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> FWIW, I would prefer PGAPPNAME to PGAPPLICATIONNAME which is what
>
>> We don't usually use abbreviations, so how about PGCLIENTNAME  or some such?
>
> Not sure I believe that argument.  Among the set of existing libpq
> environment variables I see
>
> PGHOSTADDR
> PGSSLCERT
> PGSSLCRL
> PGKRBSRVNAME
> PGTZ
> PGSYSCONFDIR
>
> so it can hardly be said that there's a policy of avoiding
> abbreviations.  PGCLIENTNAME would be better than PGAPPLICATIONNAME
> I guess, but I still prefer the other.

I also like PGAPPNAME better, for the same reasons as Tom.

...Robert


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Application name patch - v2
Следующее
От: Andrew Dunstan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Application name patch - v2