Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> writes:
> When reading a memory contexts log I realized that we have this:
> LOG: level: 2; EventTriggerCache: 8192 total in 1 blocks; 7928 free (4 chunks); 264 used
> LOG: level: 3; Event Trigger Cache: 8192 total in 1 blocks; 2616 free (0 chunks); 5576 used
> The reason is that BuildEventTriggerCache sets up a context "EventTriggerCache"
> which house a hash named "Event Trigger Cache" which in turn creates a context
> with the table name. I think it makes sense that these share the same name,
> but I think it would be less confusing if they also shared the same spelling
> whitespace-wise. Any reason to not rename the hash EventTriggerCache to make
> the logging a tiny bit easier to read and grep?
Hmm, I'm kinda -1 on them having the same name visible in the
contexts dump --- that seems very confusing. How about naming
the hash "EventTriggerCacheHash" or so?
regards, tom lane