Re: Stronger safeguard for archive recovery not to miss data

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Laurenz Albe
Тема Re: Stronger safeguard for archive recovery not to miss data
Дата
Msg-id 31f2601cf5856f0da985b12187b222bc5e338567.camel@cybertec.at
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на RE: Stronger safeguard for archive recovery not to miss data  ("osumi.takamichi@fujitsu.com" <osumi.takamichi@fujitsu.com>)
Ответы Re: Stronger safeguard for archive recovery not to miss data  (Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Thu, 2021-01-21 at 13:09 +0000, osumi.takamichi@fujitsu.com wrote:
> > My vote is that we should not have a GUC for such an unlikely event, and that
> > stopping recovery is good enough.
> 
> OK. IIUC, my current patch for this fix doesn't need to be changed or withdrawn.
> Thank you for your explanation.

Well, that's just my opinion.
Fujii Masao seemed to disagree with the patch, and his voice carries weight.

Yours,
Laurenz Albe

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Masahiko Sawada
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: New IndexAM API controlling index vacuum strategies
Следующее
От: Amul Sul
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [Patch] ALTER SYSTEM READ ONLY