Re: Stronger safeguard for archive recovery not to miss data

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Laurenz Albe
Тема Re: Stronger safeguard for archive recovery not to miss data
Дата
Msg-id 3d982f60ba2c897131dccc7111ae05ca40b33d0a.camel@cybertec.at
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Stronger safeguard for archive recovery not to miss data  (Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>)
Ответы RE: Stronger safeguard for archive recovery not to miss data  ("osumi.takamichi@fujitsu.com" <osumi.takamichi@fujitsu.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 2021-01-21 at 15:30 +0100, I wrote:
> On Thu, 2021-01-21 at 13:09 +0000, osumi.takamichi@fujitsu.com wrote:
> 
> > > My vote is that we should not have a GUC for such an unlikely event, and that
> > > stopping recovery is good enough.
> > OK. IIUC, my current patch for this fix doesn't need to be changed or withdrawn.
> > Thank you for your explanation.
> 
> Well, that's just my opinion.
> 
> Fujii Masao seemed to disagree with the patch, and his voice carries weight.

I think you should pst another patch where the second, now superfluous,
error message is removed.

Yours,
Laurenz Albe




В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Mark Rofail
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017: Foreign Key Arrays
Следующее
От: Mark Rofail
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017: Foreign Key Arrays