xchris wrote:
> On gio, 2005-10-06 at 12:20 +0100, Richard Huxton wrote:
>
>> From the manuals...
>
> I didn't search very well.Sorry!
Easy enough to miss.
>>However - I don't think you want to anyway. If you're going to use a
>>relational database, try a relational approach! Typically, you would do
>>something like [cut]
>
>
> I wanted to use a different approch because addresses don't make any
> sense for other tables and because they are typically few (3,4) and i
> wanted to avoid making a join for this task...
> however.. i will use your approch.
If you're using a relational DB, better get used to joins :-)
-- Richard Huxton Archonet Ltd