> That I could probably do. Do you think they should have a separate
> pg_stat_user_matviews table, etc., or do you think it would be
> better to include them in with tables there?
Well, ideally pg_matviews would have matview definitions, and
pg_stat_matviews would have stats on matview usage and rows. But see
what you can get done; I imagine we'll overhaul it for 9.4 anyway once
we've had a chance to use the feature.
>
>> Also a \dM.
>
> I already added it as \dm in the current patch. Does that conflict
> with something else that's pending?
Oh, no, I thought \dm was *already* in use, but apparently not.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com