AW: pg_dump / pg_restore version confusion

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Zwettler Markus (OIZ)
Тема AW: pg_dump / pg_restore version confusion
Дата
Msg-id 8b459360516e4a32aa0d675afae8357e@zuerich.ch
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: pg_dump / pg_restore version confusion  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Ответы Re: AW: pg_dump / pg_restore version confusion  (Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>)
Список pgsql-general
I cannot use pg_restore v9.6 on a pg_dump v12 because otherwise: pg_restore: [archiver] unsupported version (1.14) in
fileheader 

The external supplier did PG v9.5 database + pg_dump v12.
I would have to do pg_restore v12 (as of pg_dump v12) into my PG v9.6.
The version chain would be PG v9.5 => pg_dump v12 => pg_restore v12 => PG v9.6.

That's why my question has been: would the whole chain work and is it supported?



> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 29. Juli 2020 14:55
> An: Zwettler Markus (OIZ) <Markus.Zwettler@zuerich.ch>
> Cc: pgsql-general <pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org>
> Betreff: Re: pg_dump / pg_restore version confusion
>
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 12:33:56PM +0000, Zwettler Markus (OIZ) wrote:
> > And I can also do this restore:
> >
> > <quote>
> > Would a pg_restore with a v12 client into a postgres v9.6 database work and be
> officially supported?
> > </quote>
>
> Uh, good question.  You should still use the version of pg_restore that you are
> loading _into_, not what you dumped from.
>
> --
>   Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        https://momjian.us
>   EnterpriseDB                             https://enterprisedb.com
>
>   The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee




В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pg_dump / pg_restore version confusion
Следующее
От: Adrian Klaver
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pg_dump / pg_restore version confusion